Microbial evaluation of plaque on 3M ESPE and kids stainless steel crown in primary molars

Subramanyam, Divya; Gurunathan, Deepa

doi:10.4103/2468-8932.196483

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, these results supported by Abbas I. et al (19) who reported that zirconia crowns adhere less streptococcus colonies compared to lithium disilicate and gold crowns and attributed these results due to higher biocompatibility of zirconia. On the other hand, these results disagree with Subramanyam D, et al (13) when evaluate microbial adhesion between two commercially types of SSCs in primary molars and concluded that There was no statistically significant difference seen in the microbial count between the 3M and Kids crown and natural teeth however the drawback of this study was short duration of follow up (1 week). According to Bin AlShaibah W. et al (11) who evaluate the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to preveneered and stainless-steel crowns and reported that adhesion of S. mutans to preveneered crowns was higher than to SSC and attributed these results due to surface properties of composite which used as veneer such as chemical composition, surface free energy, and surface roughness enhance microbial adhesion.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

“…The swabs were collected before preparation of crowns, 1 month and 3 months after cementation (11) . Swabs were taken from occlusal and buccal surface by means of the tips of sterile cottons (12,13) . Samples were preserved in a tube containing 9ml thioglycolate broth medium as transfer medium to keep the viability of the aerobic and anaerobic micro-organisms under complete aseptic condition.…”

Section: Microbiological Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of microbial adhesion to zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars

2019

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Assessment of streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus adhesion to zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars Methods: One hundred and twenty randomly selected Egyptian children received bilateral crowns to first or second primary molars, one side was restored by stainless steel crowns (group A) and the other side was restored by zirconia crowns (group B). swabs were collected before preparation of crowns, 1 month and 3 months after cementation Results: There was no significant difference in the count of streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus before preparation of zirconia crowns, after 1 month and after 3 months. There was significant difference in the count of streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus before preparation of SSCs, after 1 month and after 3 months Conclusions: Zirconia crowns presented to be an excellent choice for primary posterior teeth full coverage restorations. Zirconia crowns performed better than SSCs in the aspect of prevention of plaque adhesion.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

Section: Microbiological Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of microbial adhesion to zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars

2019

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, these results were disagreed with (Subramanyam and Gurunathan (18) that was evaluating microbial adhesion between two commercially types of SSCs in primary molars and concluded that there was no statistically significant difference seen in the microbial count between the 3M and Kids crown and natural teeth however the drawback of this study was the short duration of follow up 1 week.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 64%

The Effect Of Zirconia Band And Loop Space Maintainer On Salivary Level Of Lactobacillus And Streptococcus Mutans.

emad

2021

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the zirconia band and loop space maintainers on the salivary level of lactobacillus and streptococcus mutans. Subjects and methods: This study was carried out on fifty children classified into two equal groups, Group A: Twenty-five children have received metal bands and loops space maintainers. Group B: Twentyfive children have received zirconia bands and loops space maintainers. A fresh unstimulated whole saliva sample was collected from each patient before the insertion of the space maintainer, after 2 weeks and three months after its insertion. The mean and standard deviation values were calculated for each viable counts of antibacterial activity, then transformed into their log10 values. Results: It was found that both zirconia space maintainer and band and loop space maintainer increase bacterial count insignificantly. Conclusion:Zirconia space maintainer can be used as an alternative to a conventional band and loop space maintainer.

show abstract

“…The antibacterial effects of composites for filling are mainly relevant to inhibition of plaque accumulation on the surface of the materials and tooth around the restoration (Subramanyam et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The systematic removal of all carious lesions and a thorough prophylaxis are sometimes considered to be effective methods for bringing the disease under control (Mayanagi et al, 2011;Subramanyam et al, 2016;I. Nedeljkovic et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Salivary Indicators for a Healthy Mouth: An In Vivo Study

Umadevi¹,

Konde²

2017

Int.J.Curr.Res.Aca.Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article InfoThe study aimed to assess salivary properties like salivary pH, buffering capacity and S.mutans count before and after restoration of carious lesions of primary teeth in children aged 6-12 years using three different restorative materials i.e. GIC, SS crown and composite, and divided into three groups of ten each and restored with the above materials respectively. 5ml of stimulated saliva was collected after thorough oral prophylaxis, pH was recorded using pH strips and buffering capacity by salivary buffering capacity test and S.mutans count was done by inoculating 1ml of saliva in MSB agar plate and counted after 3 days. The second and the third samples were collected on fifteenth and thirtieth day of restorations and assessed for the same. The analysed results showed a statistically significant increase in both salivary pH and buffering capacity and a decrease in S.mutans count in all the three groups when compared to the baseline data. No significant difference was seen between the groups. Hence, concluded that restoration of the tooth itself improves the salivary properties like salivary pH and buffering capacity and decreases the S.mutans count, irrespective of the materials used.

show abstract

Microbial evaluation of plaque on 3M ESPE and kids stainless steel crown in primary molars

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Assessment of microbial adhesion to zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars

Assessment of microbial adhesion to zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars

The Effect Of Zirconia Band And Loop Space Maintainer On Salivary Level Of Lactobacillus And Streptococcus Mutans.

Salivary Indicators for a Healthy Mouth: An In Vivo Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About