In this study, a pyrite‐based autotrophic denitrification (PAD) system, a polycaprolactone (PCL)‐supported heterotrophic denitrification (PHD) system, and a pyrite+PCL‐based split‐mixotrophic denitrification (PPMD) system were constructed. The pyrite particle size was controlled in 1–3, 3–5, or 5–8 mm in both the PAD and PPMD systems to investigate the effect of pyrite particle size on the denitrification performance of autotrophic or split‐mixotrophic bioreactors. It was found that the PAD system achieved the best denitrification efficiency with an average removal rate of 98.98% in the treatment of 1‐ to 3‐mm particle size, whereas it was only 19.24% in the treatment of 5‐ to 8‐mm particle size. At different phases of the whole experiment, the nitrate removal rates of both the PHD and PPMD systems remained stable at a high level (>94%). Compared with the PAD or PHD system, the PPMD system reduced the concentrations of sulfate and chemical oxygen demand in the final effluent efficiently. The interconnection network diagram explained the intrinsic metabolic pathways of nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon in the three denitrification systems at different phases. In addition, the microbial community analysis showed that the PPMD system was beneficial for the enrichment of Firmicutes. Finally, the impact mechanism of pyrite particle size on the performance of the PPMD system was proposed.Practitioner Points
The reduction of pyrite particle size was beneficial for improving the efficiency of the PAD process.
The change in particle size had an effect on NO2−‐N accumulation in the PAD system.
The accumulation of NH4+‐N in the PPMD system increased with the decrease in particle size.
The reduction of pyrite particle size increased the production of SO42− in the PAD and PPMD systems.
The correlations among the effluent indicators of the PAD and PPMD systems could be well explained.