2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial fingerprints reveal interaction between museum objects, curators, and visitors

Lukas M. Simon,
Cecilia Flocco,
Franziska Burkart
et al.
Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis confirmed the presence of species that had not been previously detected in biodeteriorated paper substrates. These species may have originated from contamination during the manufacturing process of the paper substrates 3 or from subsequent handling 75 . Several parasitic fungi that infect plants have been identified, including Parastagonospora nodorum (#1), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (#1), Zymoseptoria tritici (#1), Pyricularia oryzae (#1, #3), Blumeria hordei (#2, #4) and Eremothecium gossypii (#4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis confirmed the presence of species that had not been previously detected in biodeteriorated paper substrates. These species may have originated from contamination during the manufacturing process of the paper substrates 3 or from subsequent handling 75 . Several parasitic fungi that infect plants have been identified, including Parastagonospora nodorum (#1), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (#1), Zymoseptoria tritici (#1), Pyricularia oryzae (#1, #3), Blumeria hordei (#2, #4) and Eremothecium gossypii (#4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they can also provide important clues about interactions of the relics with human interactions [59]. As such, they can provide important information in fields such as biocodicology, archeology, criminology but also in human contamination from handling [20,21,[60][61][62]. While an emerging topic, attempts to apply the Oxford Nanopore ® sequencer for the identification of the microbiome and animal ancient DNA (aDNA) from a 15th-century parchment from the Graphic Collection (Kupferstichkabinett) of the Academy of Fine Arts, in Vienna [60], have also been conducted.…”
Section: Cultural Heritage Object Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These unique signatures can be potentially used in forensic studies for individual identification, trace evidence tracking in contact-related crime scenes and geographical localization [53,129,130]. Studies have demonstrated that remnants of human microbiota persist in the environments we inhabit and on the surfaces with which we come into contact [57,103,[131][132][133][134][135]. In a 2010 study, Fierer et al demonstrated that skin-associated bacteria, recoverable from surfaces such as individual computer keys and computer mice, exhibit community structures that enable the discrimination of objects handled by different individuals, even after remaining untouched for up to 2 weeks [57].…”
Section: The Discriminatory Power Of Forensic Microbiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Simon et al examined the microbial composition of museum objects, demonstrating that microbial signatures can effectively track exposure to human touch and differentiate objects handled by distinct individuals. Additionally, their research revealed that human contact might overwrite the previous microbial profile of an object, making it difficult to accurately trace individuals based on the microbial signatures left on objects [135].…”
Section: The Discriminatory Power Of Forensic Microbiologymentioning
confidence: 99%