2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial immobilisation and turnover of 15N labelled substrates in two arable soils under field and laboratory conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first phase is likely a microbial response to the pulse of water soluble substrates released either as a result of soil disturbance in the case of soil incubation without maize leaves or as a direct result of added fresh substrates in the case of maize leaf addition. Microbial assimilation of the available substrates and associated growth of microbial biomass should dominate the first phase, causing the phenomenon of negative priming, possibly because the hypothesized “preferential substrate utilization” by which soil microbes switch to added substrates and use less of original substrates [ 32 ]. The negative correlation between the priming effect and microbial biomass carbon during the initial 60-days ( Fig 8C ) indeed supports this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first phase is likely a microbial response to the pulse of water soluble substrates released either as a result of soil disturbance in the case of soil incubation without maize leaves or as a direct result of added fresh substrates in the case of maize leaf addition. Microbial assimilation of the available substrates and associated growth of microbial biomass should dominate the first phase, causing the phenomenon of negative priming, possibly because the hypothesized “preferential substrate utilization” by which soil microbes switch to added substrates and use less of original substrates [ 32 ]. The negative correlation between the priming effect and microbial biomass carbon during the initial 60-days ( Fig 8C ) indeed supports this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from r- to K-strategy) [ 35 ], the second phase should be dominated by microbes with K-strategy such as specialized bacteria and fungi which have been shown to be responsible for positive priming effects [ 36 ]. It is also likely that the C (and N) assimilated into microbial biomass during the first phase gets mineralized during the second phase due to the increased turnover of microbial biomass due to the die-out after the initial pulse of growth induced by the fresh substrate input [ 16 , 32 ]. Indeed, the second phase occurred during the transition period from relatively high microbial biomass C to a stabilized lower microbial biomass, indicating a faster microbial turnover rate ( Fig 8C ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil microorganisms and microbial extracellular enzymes involved in N cycling play a crucial role in sustaining soil quality, ecosystem processes, including the acquisition of essential soil nutrients [12], decomposition of organic matter [13], nitrogen (N) cycling and carbon (C) cycling [14]. These are measured as microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) and carbon (SMBC), primarily known as "biological traits", which are key indicators of soil health [15,16] and are also stated as the sensitive indicators of organic matter decomposition and N mineralization [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthworms not only stimulate organic matter (OM) decomposition, but they also promote SOM stabilization within soil aggregates [9,10]. Decomposition is enhanced both by increasing the access of microbial decomposers to OM substrates through mixing and fragmentation of litter [9,[11][12][13][14] and by stimulating the activity of the ingested soil-derived earthworm gut microbiome, which accelerates the breakdown of earthworm-ingested OM during gut passage. This latter is referred to as 'the sleeping beauty paradox' [3,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%