2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89621-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Remediation of Metals in Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although challenges exist, organic polluted sites can be effectively restored through bioremediation strategies. On the other hand, the removal of metal ion pollutants is a particularly difficult task because metals cannot be degraded; only their chemical speciation can be changed (Hietala & Roane, 2009). Hence, bacteria‐based organic pollutant bioremediation approaches require that microorganisms are active in the presence of the target contaminant, as well as other co‐contaminants such as toxic metals (Sandrin & Hoffman, 2007; Hietala & Roane, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although challenges exist, organic polluted sites can be effectively restored through bioremediation strategies. On the other hand, the removal of metal ion pollutants is a particularly difficult task because metals cannot be degraded; only their chemical speciation can be changed (Hietala & Roane, 2009). Hence, bacteria‐based organic pollutant bioremediation approaches require that microorganisms are active in the presence of the target contaminant, as well as other co‐contaminants such as toxic metals (Sandrin & Hoffman, 2007; Hietala & Roane, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…organic acids, siderophores), biosurfactants, biomass production and oxidation/reduction reactions. (Zhuang et al 2007 ;Wei et al 2003 ;Watts and Lloyd 2012 ;Sivaruban et al 2014 ;Barea et al 2005 ;Khan 2005 ;Hietala and Roane 2009 ;Juwarkar et al 2011 ;Pacwa-Plociniczak et al 2011 ;Jing et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Contaminated Soilsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, a promising, alternative approach to chemical amendments could be the application of microbemediated processes which is also being commonly referred to as 'microbial remediation'. In this process, microbial metabolites/activities in the soil alter the mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals (Hietala and Roane 2009 ;Rajendran et al 2003 ;Monachese et al 2012 ;Umrania 2006 ;Wenzel 2009 ;Rajkumar et al 2010 ;Miransari 2011 ;Yang et al 2012 ;Zhu et al 2015 ). It has thus been proposed as an alternative method to remediate heavy metals from soil since it does not affect soil health and fertility (Zhuang et al 2007 ;Sessitsch et al 2013 ).…”
Section: Contaminated Soilsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Heavy metals mainly exist in the forms of Me 2+ , MeSO 4 , and MeCl -at pH<7, while MeHCO 3 + and MeCO 3 are dominant at pH>7 (Hietala & Roane, 2009). In the study of Sandrin & Maier (2002), the ionic cadmium (Cd 2+ ) concentration at pH 4 was 44 mg/L while it decreased to 4 mg/L at pH 7.…”
Section: Metal-microbe Interaction and Metal Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal bioavailability is also influenced by redox potential. High redox potential (800 to 0 mV) favors metal solubility while low redox potential (0 to -400 mV) immobilises metal in precipitated forms (Hietala & Roane, 2009). Microbial bioremediation affects the fate of heavy metals.…”
Section: Metal-microbe Interaction and Metal Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%