2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial stabilisation of white wine by filtration through silica microparticles functionalised with natural antimicrobials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described by [37], the immobilization of natural antimicrobials as processing aids to preserve fruit-derived foods in the past few years has attracted attention to developing filtration systems with both the benefits of the antimicrobial compound and the particle size pore action for the antimicrobial effect in liquid food filtration. Even if the antimicrobial effect of the system proposed in this arrangement is not enough to guarantee disinfection [22,38], the obtained results incentivize looking for longer contact times and increase the number of beads forming the column to be implemented as an alternative as a method of microbial inactivation. no significant differences between each other (0.5 and 0.1% eugenol) but difference (p < 0.05) between C1 and E1.…”
Section: Dilution Assay (Bead Column) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by [37], the immobilization of natural antimicrobials as processing aids to preserve fruit-derived foods in the past few years has attracted attention to developing filtration systems with both the benefits of the antimicrobial compound and the particle size pore action for the antimicrobial effect in liquid food filtration. Even if the antimicrobial effect of the system proposed in this arrangement is not enough to guarantee disinfection [22,38], the obtained results incentivize looking for longer contact times and increase the number of beads forming the column to be implemented as an alternative as a method of microbial inactivation. no significant differences between each other (0.5 and 0.1% eugenol) but difference (p < 0.05) between C1 and E1.…”
Section: Dilution Assay (Bead Column) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that this filtration technology is a promising alternative to existing pasteurization technologies that apply heat. In another work, Ruiz-Rico et al (2021) [59] evaluated filter aids based on the covalent immobilization of different EOCs and other phenolic compounds on wine microbiological stabilization. These filtering aids presented some advantages over standard filtration materials, such as minimal impact on wine sensory characteristics and high removal capacity.…”
Section: Use As Food Processing Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique is only applied before bottling and has some drawbacks due to its potentially deleterious effects on flavor and color properties of wines, depending on filter media and intrinsic wine characteristics. Sterile filtration presents further practical problems associated with frequent fouling, the high cost of filters, their management, and the possible recontamination of wines during bottling [8]. Heat treatments, despite their well-known high efficacy in terms of microbial inactivation, are not commonly used in wineries due to the negative effects of high temperature on the valuable sensory properties of wine [9].…”
Section: Current Innovative Strategies For Microbial Decontamination In Winemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%