2014
DOI: 10.1071/en13238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbially mediated reduction of FeIII and AsV in Cambodian sediments amended with 13C-labelled hexadecane and kerogen

Abstract: Environmental context. The use of groundwater with elevated concentrations of arsenic for drinking, cooking or irrigation has resulted in the worst mass poisoning in human history. This study shows that organic compounds that can be found in arsenic rich subsurface sediments may be used by indigenous microorganisms, contributing to the release of arsenic from the sediments into the groundwater. This study increases our understanding of the range of organic substrates (and their sources) that can potentially st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between grainsize and CPI shows that sandy sediments primarily contain thermally mature OC which previous studies have shown to be bioavailable but at relatively low concentrations 1214,16,17,50 . The results shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation between grainsize and CPI shows that sandy sediments primarily contain thermally mature OC which previous studies have shown to be bioavailable but at relatively low concentrations 1214,16,17,50 . The results shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Previous studies have already shown that thermally mature (petroleum-derived) OC exists in the sands and is bioavailable, yet the concentrations are very low 1114,16,17,50 . These results show that a much greater reservoir of plant derived OC exists in the clays both from the early Holocene (>7,000 years BP) and more recent Holocene (<2,000 years BP).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, there is a consensus that arsenic is naturally released from sediments to water under microbially induced reducing conditions within the aquifer sediments ( 10 12 ). Furthermore, previous studies suggest that the biogeochemical cycling of iron and arsenic, specifically the reduction of mineral assemblages containing Fe(III) and sorbed arsenic(V), plays a critical role in the mobilization of arsenic in aquifers ( 13 18 ). Although most of these studies have been based on “lab microcosm” incubations, the precise mechanisms of arsenic release in situ remain poorly constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a wide range of organisms carry the arsenic resistance operon, including many that are not implicated in arsenic mobilization, a narrow distribution of organisms can respire As(V) ( 27 29 ). Laboratory incubations (or “microcosms”) using sediments supplied with the addition of 13 C-labeled carbon sources have also suggested that the expression of arrA could be an important factor in controlling the high concentrations of arsenic in aquifers ( 14 , 30 33 ). However, only a few studies have examined arsenic reduction by microorganisms in the aquifers with geogenic arsenic via the direct analysis of the field samples, which lack exogenous carbon sources and exhibit lower rates of metabolism ( 34 , 35 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Wovkulich et al investigated how the injection of oxalic acid can enhance the remediation of arsenic at an arsenic-contaminated field site [5] whereas Ruzoulis et al used an approach employing 13 C-labelled organic compounds to evaluate the reduction of Fe III and As V in arsenic contaminated sediments. [6] The second part of this Research Front deals with studies on arsenic removal and the prediction of arsenic contamination in the environment. Corsini et al studied the effectiveness of different sorbents and biological oxidation on the removal of arsenic from groundwater, [7] whereas Voegelin et al [8] and Wenk et al [9] show results for arsenic removal from water with two different kinds of household filters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%