2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiologic and Histologic Assessment of Intentional Bacterial Contamination of Bone Grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously studied decontamination techniques have included mechanical scrubbing, serial dilution, exposure to various antibacterial agents, and autoclaving 4,8,[10][11][12][13][14] . Previous studies have been limited as they have not tested osteoarticular fragments (which have a different contamination risk when compared with bone-tendon grafts), have not focused on the range of bacteria likely encountered on the operating room floor, and have not rigorously tested the impact of decontamination on cell viability 12,[14][15][16][17] . The present study was designed as a three-phase investigation to identify a readily employable, scientifically justified, intraoperative management scheme for the surgeon who is faced with a contaminated but nondisposable autologous osteoarticular bone fragment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously studied decontamination techniques have included mechanical scrubbing, serial dilution, exposure to various antibacterial agents, and autoclaving 4,8,[10][11][12][13][14] . Previous studies have been limited as they have not tested osteoarticular fragments (which have a different contamination risk when compared with bone-tendon grafts), have not focused on the range of bacteria likely encountered on the operating room floor, and have not rigorously tested the impact of decontamination on cell viability 12,[14][15][16][17] . The present study was designed as a three-phase investigation to identify a readily employable, scientifically justified, intraoperative management scheme for the surgeon who is faced with a contaminated but nondisposable autologous osteoarticular bone fragment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, several authors described their successful experiences with different sterilization techniques including boiling, autoclaving, gamma irradiation, and soaking in chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and antibiotic solutions [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Autoclaving seems to be the most efficient method of decontamination but there are multiple concerns regarding loss of graft osteoinductive properties [4,14]. Due to the fact that data regarding the efficacy of different sterilization techniques cannot provide a clear guide as to which technique is ultimately superior, we do not believe that the type of sterilization solution used will accurately predict the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported rifamycin may positively affect bone tissue, extraction socket healing, and osteomyelitis treatment. [16][17][18][19] In the literature, there is a little knowledge about the effect of antibiotics on BMP expression. Previously Ufuk et al 20 reported rifamycin is a suitable solution for bone decontamination and may induce BMP-2 expression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 On the other hand; previous studies and our study demonstrate higher osteoblast counts, enhanced bone formation 19 , high tolerance by bone 17,18 , and no histological damage. 16 Cytotoxicity may associated with dose, concentration, the type of antimicrobial and exposure time. 2 The selection of appropriate local antibiotics should consider antimicrobial effects, cytotoxicity, concentration and dosage factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation