2012
DOI: 10.4314/ijbcs.v6i4.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological evaluation of sachet water and street-vended yoghurt and “Zobo” drinks sold in Nsukka metropolis

Abstract: Microbial, physical and chemical characteristics of six brands of sachet water and street-vended yoghurt (two) and "Zobo" drinks (three) sold in Nsukka metropolis were studied. Parameters such pH, total dissolved solids, copper, iron, alkalinity, appearance, taste, colour, aerobic mesophilic count, coliform counts were evaluated. Data obtained from the study showed that the yoghurt and "Zobo" drinks sold at the moment are bacteriologically safe. "Zobo" drink samples had total plate count of 9.9×10 1 CFU/ml to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of contaminated water in the manufacturing of processed food in resourcepoor areas such as the present sample location has been reported (Mbaeyi-Nwaoha et al, 2012;Ayoade et al, 2013;Ogunyemi et al, 2015), However, results from the present study show that regardless of the microbiologically safe processing of the groundnut product in the laboratory by the use of sterilized distilled water and maintenance of standard hygiene procedures, there is only a marginal reduction in the level of contamination by aflatoxin producing microorganisms when compared with the field samples. These results indicate that not all the contamination of the finished product is ascribable to unhygienic processing of kulikuli but a major portion of the contamination has already occurred during the pre and postharvest, pre-processing stages of the groundnut.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…The use of contaminated water in the manufacturing of processed food in resourcepoor areas such as the present sample location has been reported (Mbaeyi-Nwaoha et al, 2012;Ayoade et al, 2013;Ogunyemi et al, 2015), However, results from the present study show that regardless of the microbiologically safe processing of the groundnut product in the laboratory by the use of sterilized distilled water and maintenance of standard hygiene procedures, there is only a marginal reduction in the level of contamination by aflatoxin producing microorganisms when compared with the field samples. These results indicate that not all the contamination of the finished product is ascribable to unhygienic processing of kulikuli but a major portion of the contamination has already occurred during the pre and postharvest, pre-processing stages of the groundnut.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…The presence of coliforms in these yoghurts could pose an adverse effect in consumers' health and suggests negligence on the part of the producers or the yoghurt vendors as well as quality controllers. According to the standard stipulated by the National Agency of Food and Drug Administration Control (NAFDAC), E. coli and coliforms generally must not be detectable in any 100 ml of yoghurt sample [ 45 ]. Other probabilities of contamination can be from contaminated water source and equipment used or due to contamination at storage and display/sale outlet [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 45 articles that evaluated total coliforms contamination, six showed zero risk of contamination [49,57,59,74,77,78], three reported total coliforms contamination but did not quantify the number of positive samples or brands [39,69,76]; and the remaining 36 studies showed crude contamination prevalence ranging from 5.13 to 100%. Overall, five of the total coliforms articles reported counts of 1-10 MPN per 100 ml [41,47,65,67,81], 19 showed counts of 11-100 MPN per 100 ml [35,36,38,39,42,43,46,48,50,51,53,5 4,56,68,72,79,80,82,83], nine showed counts >100 MPN per 100 ml [34,52,55,58,[69][70][71]73,76] while the remainder did not quantify the bacteria counts.…”
Section: Overview Of Microbial Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%