Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The sections in this article are: Observation of Fusion Requires Physical Techniques for Monitoring Mixing of Membranes and the Compartments they Enclose Morphological Changes Following Fusion Are Observed by Light Microscopy but Membrane Fusion May Occur without such Changes Fluorescence Microscopy and Spectrofluorometry Allow Quantitation of Membrane Fusion Events in Living Cells Electron Microscopy Provides Direct Observation of Structural Rearrangements Due to Fusion Patch‐Clamp Techniques Allow the Monitoring of Very Fast Openings of Fusion Pores What Do We Learn from “Nonbiological” Fusion Processes? Ca 2+ Induces Aggregation Destabilization, and Fusion of Liposomes Containing Phospholipids with Negatively Charged Head‐groups Fusion of Lipid Membranes by Amphipathic and Nonpolar Molecules Correlates with Their Lytic and Aggregational Activity Dehydration, Aggregation, and Destabilization of Membranes by Polyethelene Glycol Are Essential for Fusion of Lipid Membranes Destabilization by High‐Voltage Electric Pulses Leads to Fusion of Adjoining Membranes Molecular Rearrangements in the Lipid Bilayers during the Very Act of Fusion May Involve Intermediate Structures Specialized Proteins Mediate Fusion in Life Processes Viral Envelope Proteins Contain Hydrophobic “Fusion Peptide” Sequences To Enter a Cell a Virus Must Find the Receptor That Invites It In Some Viruses Require More Than One Type of Envelope Protein for Entry Influenza Hemagglutinin Was the Only Fusion Protein with Known Three‐Dimensional Structure The Process of HA ‐mediated Membrane Fusion Can Be Dissected into a Number of Elementary Steps Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 ( HIV ‐1), the Primary Etiological Agent of the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ( AIDS ), Enters Cells by Membrane Fusion at Neutral pH The Receptor CD 4 Plays Both a Passive and an Active Role in Allowing Entry of the Virus into the Cell Stable Envelope Glycoprotein‐Receptor Complex Formation Is Rate‐limiting in the Overall Fusion Process Multiple Copies of the HIV ‐1 Envelope Glycoprotein May Be Required for Fusion Pore Formation Sperm Membrane Proteins Involved in Sperm‐Egg Fusion May Resemble Viral Fusion Proteins Toward A Resolution of Fusion Proteins in Exocytosis Multiple Proteins May Be Required for Intracellular Fusion Toward A Physicochemical Analysis of Fusion Kinetics Delays in Fusion Are Proportional to the Fusion Barriers and Decrease with an Increase in the Strength of the Fusogen Rates of Fusion Can Provide Information for the Time Course of Membrane Merging and Fusion Pore Expansion Fusion Yields and Delays Are Related but May Reflect Different Properties of the Fusing Membranes Does Understanding Membrane Fusion Need New Breakthroughs in Methodology? Note Added in Proof
The sections in this article are: Observation of Fusion Requires Physical Techniques for Monitoring Mixing of Membranes and the Compartments they Enclose Morphological Changes Following Fusion Are Observed by Light Microscopy but Membrane Fusion May Occur without such Changes Fluorescence Microscopy and Spectrofluorometry Allow Quantitation of Membrane Fusion Events in Living Cells Electron Microscopy Provides Direct Observation of Structural Rearrangements Due to Fusion Patch‐Clamp Techniques Allow the Monitoring of Very Fast Openings of Fusion Pores What Do We Learn from “Nonbiological” Fusion Processes? Ca 2+ Induces Aggregation Destabilization, and Fusion of Liposomes Containing Phospholipids with Negatively Charged Head‐groups Fusion of Lipid Membranes by Amphipathic and Nonpolar Molecules Correlates with Their Lytic and Aggregational Activity Dehydration, Aggregation, and Destabilization of Membranes by Polyethelene Glycol Are Essential for Fusion of Lipid Membranes Destabilization by High‐Voltage Electric Pulses Leads to Fusion of Adjoining Membranes Molecular Rearrangements in the Lipid Bilayers during the Very Act of Fusion May Involve Intermediate Structures Specialized Proteins Mediate Fusion in Life Processes Viral Envelope Proteins Contain Hydrophobic “Fusion Peptide” Sequences To Enter a Cell a Virus Must Find the Receptor That Invites It In Some Viruses Require More Than One Type of Envelope Protein for Entry Influenza Hemagglutinin Was the Only Fusion Protein with Known Three‐Dimensional Structure The Process of HA ‐mediated Membrane Fusion Can Be Dissected into a Number of Elementary Steps Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 ( HIV ‐1), the Primary Etiological Agent of the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ( AIDS ), Enters Cells by Membrane Fusion at Neutral pH The Receptor CD 4 Plays Both a Passive and an Active Role in Allowing Entry of the Virus into the Cell Stable Envelope Glycoprotein‐Receptor Complex Formation Is Rate‐limiting in the Overall Fusion Process Multiple Copies of the HIV ‐1 Envelope Glycoprotein May Be Required for Fusion Pore Formation Sperm Membrane Proteins Involved in Sperm‐Egg Fusion May Resemble Viral Fusion Proteins Toward A Resolution of Fusion Proteins in Exocytosis Multiple Proteins May Be Required for Intracellular Fusion Toward A Physicochemical Analysis of Fusion Kinetics Delays in Fusion Are Proportional to the Fusion Barriers and Decrease with an Increase in the Strength of the Fusogen Rates of Fusion Can Provide Information for the Time Course of Membrane Merging and Fusion Pore Expansion Fusion Yields and Delays Are Related but May Reflect Different Properties of the Fusing Membranes Does Understanding Membrane Fusion Need New Breakthroughs in Methodology? Note Added in Proof
Electric impulses (8 kV/cm, 5 microseconds) were found to increase greatly the uptake of DNA into cells. When linear or circular plasmid DNA containing the herpes simplex thymidine kinase (TK) gene is added to a suspension of mouse L cells deficient in the TK gene and the cells are then exposed to electric fields, stable transformants are formed that survive in the HAT selection medium. At 20 degrees C after the application of three successive electric impulses followed by 10 min to allow DNA entry there result 95 (+/‐ 3) transformants per 10(6) cells and per 1.2 micrograms DNA. Compared with biochemical techniques, the electric field method of gene transfer is very simple, easily applicable, and very efficient. Because the mechanism of DNA transport through cell membranes is not known, a simple physical model for the enhanced DNA penetration into cells in high electric fields is proposed. According to this ‘electroporation model’ the interaction of the external electric field with the lipid dipoles of a pore configuration induces and stabilizes the permeation sites and thus enhances cross membrane transport.
The aim of this study was to check the action of electric field pulses (1) on the survival of intact cells and protoplasts of Bacillus cereus and ( 2 ) on the transformation frequency of these protoplasts with plasmid DNA from Bacillus thuringiensis transformants. -B. cerew cells and protoplasts are very resistant to high electric field pulses in the microsecond range. The transformation frequency of B. cereus protoplasts with plasmids from B. thuringiensis (PUB 110) can be increased by about one order of magnitude with the electric field pulse technique. The transformants are stable and PUB 110 is preserved as an extrachromosomal element.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.