Although chemolithotrophy in bacteria using iron oxidation as a source of energy for CO, assimilation and growth was proposed by WINOGRADSKY (1888) during the earliest studies of autotrophic bacteria, the existence of such bacteria was subsequently seriously doubted (BAAS BECKING and PARKS 1927, LEES 1955). I n the past 20 years, studies on Thiobacillus ferrooxidans have demonstrated beyond all doubt that the oxidation of ferrous to ferric iron can supply all the energy needed by it to support growth. These bacteria require low pII and generally exhibit a remarkable tolerance to dissolved metal ions. As well as oxidizing Fe2+ they will also oxidize inorganic sulphur compounds and can thus be classified as thiobacilli. Three distinct names are, however, used in the literature : Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans and F . sulfooxidans (TEMPLE and COLMER 1951, LEATHEN et al. 1956, KINSEL 1960. I n our view, supported by a number of published comments, all types are basically the same, and the name given to the earliest named iron-oxidizer, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans HINKLE 1947, TEMPLE andCOLMER 1951) is the only correct one for all the "ferrobacilli", and is used in this paper to describe all the strains used hitherto.Our aim in this paper is to review current views and recent advances relating to the physiology and ecology of T . ferrooxidans and to consider these facts in relation to its role in mineral leaching and other biotechnological applications in industrial metallurgy.