2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbotryum heliospermae, a new anther smut fungus parasitic on Heliosperma pusillum in the mountains of the European Alpine System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
34
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The anther smuts of Caryophyllaceae , commonly referred to as the Microbotryum violaceum complex, form a monophyletic lineage within the genus Microbotryum . They are model organisms studied in many disciplines of fungal biology, for example, ecology (Thrall et al 1993), genomics (Hood 2005, Yockteng et al 2007), population studies (Lee 1981, Alexander & Antonovics 1995, Alexander et al 1996), life cycle studies (Schäfer et al 2010), geographic distribution (Hood et al 2010, Fontaine et al 2013), phylogeography (Vercken et al 2010), evolutionary history (López-Villavicencio et al 2005, Refrégier et al 2008), speciation (Devier et al 2010, Gladieux et al 2011), and phylogeny and systematics (Lutz et al 2005, 2008, Denchev et al 2009, Piątek et al 2012, Kemler et al 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anther smuts of Caryophyllaceae , commonly referred to as the Microbotryum violaceum complex, form a monophyletic lineage within the genus Microbotryum . They are model organisms studied in many disciplines of fungal biology, for example, ecology (Thrall et al 1993), genomics (Hood 2005, Yockteng et al 2007), population studies (Lee 1981, Alexander & Antonovics 1995, Alexander et al 1996), life cycle studies (Schäfer et al 2010), geographic distribution (Hood et al 2010, Fontaine et al 2013), phylogeography (Vercken et al 2010), evolutionary history (López-Villavicencio et al 2005, Refrégier et al 2008), speciation (Devier et al 2010, Gladieux et al 2011), and phylogeny and systematics (Lutz et al 2005, 2008, Denchev et al 2009, Piątek et al 2012, Kemler et al 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, host specificity – and sometimes subtle morphological differences – has led to the division of this complex into a group of species, whose differences have been supported by DNA analyses (Freeman et al 2002, Lutz et al . 2005, 2008, Le Gac et al 2007, Refrégier et al 2008, Piątek et al 2012, 2013). Following a consolidated species concept approach (Quaedvlieg et al 2014), anther smuts on Caryophyllaceae are currently divided into 23 species that are usually highly host-specific (Deml & Oberwinkler 1982, 1983, Scholz & Scholz 1988, Vánky 1988, Chlebicki & Suková 2005, Lutz et al 2005, 2008, Denchev 2007a, 2007b, Denchev et al 2009, Denchev & Denchev 2011, Piątek et al 2012, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005, 2008, Le Gac et al 2007, Refrégier et al 2008, Piątek et al 2012, 2013). Following a consolidated species concept approach (Quaedvlieg et al 2014), anther smuts on Caryophyllaceae are currently divided into 23 species that are usually highly host-specific (Deml & Oberwinkler 1982, 1983, Scholz & Scholz 1988, Vánky 1988, Chlebicki & Suková 2005, Lutz et al 2005, 2008, Denchev 2007a, 2007b, Denchev et al 2009, Denchev & Denchev 2011, Piątek et al 2012, 2013). Yet, the process of disentangling this species complex is still not finished and several groups, such as species on Dianthus (Kemler et al 2013) or species on diverse, mostly non-European Silene species (Vánky 2012) still need to be resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in Europe and East Asia (Vánky 2012;Denchev et al 2013). However, recent molecular studies revealed that many morphologically defined polyphagous smuts and false smuts in fact represent complexes of host-specific independent cryptic or pseudocryptic species (Vánky and Lutz 2007;Bauer et al 2008;Lutz et al 2005Lutz et al , 2008Piątek et al 2011Piątek et al , 2012Piątek et al , 2013aSavchenko et al 2014a, b;Vasighzadeh et al 2014) and, therefore, Anthracoidea found on Carex koshewnikowii could be a species different than Anthracoidea sempervirentis. Thus, this study aims to resolve the systematic placement of Anthracoidea on Carex koshewnikowii using light and scanning electron microscopy and phylogenetic analyses using LSU rDNA sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%