2009
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2009.1145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbubble destruction by dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation

Abstract: The efficiency of high-frequency destruction of microbubble-based contrast agent is limited by the high pressure threshold, while the difficulty of spatially confining destruction induced by low-frequency excitation to a small sample volume potentially increases the risk of adverse bioeffects. The dual-frequency excitation method involves the simultaneous transmission of 2 high-frequency sinusoids to produce an envelope signal at the difference frequency. The envelope signal provides the low-frequency driving … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small frequency difference means the long beating period. The pressure threshold for microbubble destruction by the long pulses was found to become lower at a small frequency difference [20]. Additional effects, such as heating and rectified diffusion, may become prominent after the exposure of the long pulses and alter the medium or the nuclei population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A small frequency difference means the long beating period. The pressure threshold for microbubble destruction by the long pulses was found to become lower at a small frequency difference [20]. Additional effects, such as heating and rectified diffusion, may become prominent after the exposure of the long pulses and alter the medium or the nuclei population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Two high driving frequencies around the resonant frequency of the transducer could be applied to one transducer using the magnetic signal coupling [19]. The nonlinear oscillation and destruction of microbubbles can be effectively enhanced by the low-frequency envelope (their frequency difference) [20]. Thus, the pressure threshold for microbubble destruction becomes lower, which saved almost 30% power in order to achieve the same thrombolysis efficiency [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study also demonstrated that microbubble destruction is more efficient for the DF excitation method than for a conventional single-frequency method (Yeh et al 2009). For potential applications of DF excitation with the coded excitation method, a higher axial resolution of contrast imaging, while maintaining the impinging insonation energy, can help us to increase the capability of depth penetration in high-frequency microbubbles for a destruction/replenishment imaging system.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It should be noted that the period number of lower frequency is used for the dual-frequency case, similar to the previous study (Wang et al 2021). Actually, the amplitude of dualfrequency ultrasound is modulated by the two single-frequency components (Yeh et al 2009, Guédra et al 2017, Law and Zhou 2018, Suo et al 2018, Zhou and Lei 2020, thus the dual-frequency driving is still periodic and its period can be calculated as the method described in the previous study (Hegedűs et al 2020). In our simulations, the calculations were performed during five periods of the dual-frequency ultrasound.…”
Section: Comparation Of Bubble Dynamics Under Single-and Dual-frequen...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Note that the larger the peak negative acoustic pressure is, the larger the bubble expansion becomes. For the same energy input, the peak negative acoustic pressure dual-frequency ultrasound could be larger than that of each single-frequency ultrasound ( P PNP ∆ > 0), which is conducive to enhance the bubble cavitation and its associated bio-effects (Yeh et al 2009, Hegedűs et al 2020. Therefore, the frequency ratio and the phase difference between the two components can be reasonably chosen to maximize the peak negative acoustic pressure of the resultant dual-frequency ultrasound, thereby achieving an obvious enhancement of the bubble dynamics.…”
Section: Influence Of Frequency Ratio and Phase Differencementioning
confidence: 99%