2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-008-0605-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcasting of Al bronze: influence of casting parameters on the microstructure and the mechanical properties

Abstract: In this work the influence of the casting parameters on the microstructure and the mechanical properties of extremely small parts produced by microcasting was investigated. Different specimens were cast using an aluminum bronze with a composition defined by DIN EN 17 665. It was found that the yield stress and the ultimate tensile strength of micro tensile test specimens increase when decreasing the mold temperature from 1,000 to 700°C. This correlates with the increasing fineness of the microstructure. Additi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of mold temperature on the specimens' microstructure presented in Fig. 1a-d is not as pronounced as reported in (Baumeister et al 2007a, b;Baumeister et al 2008). Whilst the a-phase is clearly dominant in both cases, its size and morphology as well as the overall specimen microstructure do not compare well with recent results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of mold temperature on the specimens' microstructure presented in Fig. 1a-d is not as pronounced as reported in (Baumeister et al 2007a, b;Baumeister et al 2008). Whilst the a-phase is clearly dominant in both cases, its size and morphology as well as the overall specimen microstructure do not compare well with recent results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…This fact could be explained by the lower cooling rate of the mold with T m = 1,000°C, because reduced quenching effect supports the development of this phase. Investigations on the source of the microstructural differences between specimens in the present study and that in (Baumeister et al 2007a, b;Baumeister et al 2008) reveal that neither the geometry of the runner and sprue system (V-shaped compared to T-shaped for present study) nor the slightly lower amount of material (16 vs. 20 g for this study) have significant influences on the microstructure. The starting materials used in both studies have the same nominal chemical composition which allows a certain range.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 3 more Smart Citations