2018 20th International Symposium on Electrical Apparatus and Technologies (SIELA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/siela.2018.8447148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcontroller Based Implementation of Peak Current Control Method in a Bidirectional Buck-Boost DC-DC Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 presents in detail the aforementioned converter topology; the two converters are connected in series to perform the virtual electrical power consumption at the circuitry input-i.e., the Buck converter's side-and the electrical power recovery at the circuitry output-i.e., the Boost converter's side-having negligible actual power consumption. The virtual power consumption concept is imposed via the Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) control technique that has been selected to drive both Buck and Boost converters; more specifically, in the Buck converter case, the Peak Current Control switching strategy is selected [15][16][17], while in the Boost converter case Average Power Control technique is used [18][19][20]. This way, the appropriate switching pulses for each control strategy are applied to switches S Buck and S Boost .…”
Section: Power Converter Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 presents in detail the aforementioned converter topology; the two converters are connected in series to perform the virtual electrical power consumption at the circuitry input-i.e., the Buck converter's side-and the electrical power recovery at the circuitry output-i.e., the Boost converter's side-having negligible actual power consumption. The virtual power consumption concept is imposed via the Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) control technique that has been selected to drive both Buck and Boost converters; more specifically, in the Buck converter case, the Peak Current Control switching strategy is selected [15][16][17], while in the Boost converter case Average Power Control technique is used [18][19][20]. This way, the appropriate switching pulses for each control strategy are applied to switches S Buck and S Boost .…”
Section: Power Converter Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, synchronous operation can be supported, because of the half-bridge configuration of the topology. If synchronous operation is not desired, then the antiparallel diode of the inactive switch operates as a freewheeling diode [22].…”
Section: Bidirectional Buck-boost Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, synchronous operation can be supported, because of the half-bridge configuration of the topology. If synchronous operation is not desired, then the antiparallel diode of the inactive switch operates as a freewheeling diode [22]. In addition, the converter may operate either in Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM), or in Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM), depending on the inductor current.…”
Section: Bidirectional Buck-boost Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations