2015
DOI: 10.1590/1516-1439.346814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcosm Biofilm Formation on Titanium Surfaces

Abstract: Risk factors associated with peri-implantitis are related to the biofilm composition around the implant and the ability of bacterial adhesion. This study evaluated the biofilm formation on different surfaces of commercially pure titanium (CP Ti) grade 4 after 12, 24, 48 and 168 hours using the microcosm technique and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The following surface conditions were examined: S (control)-smooth and plain; B-sand-blasted with aluminum oxide; E-etched using nitric acid; and BE-the combina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is controversy on when is the critical point in biofilm development in which surface roughness could have a bigger impact (adhesion, growth or maturation). Some studies have reported a greater influence at early stages(Al‐Ahmad et al, ; Dal Agnol et al, ; Frojd et al, ; Lin, Liu, Wismeijer, Crielaard, & Deng, ), while others have shown a higher impact of rougher surfaces with increasing amounts of bacteria, as biofilms become mature(Al‐Ahmad et al, ; John, Becker, & Schwarz, ). Further studies are needed to identify the critical point in biofilm development for surface topography to have a bigger impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is controversy on when is the critical point in biofilm development in which surface roughness could have a bigger impact (adhesion, growth or maturation). Some studies have reported a greater influence at early stages(Al‐Ahmad et al, ; Dal Agnol et al, ; Frojd et al, ; Lin, Liu, Wismeijer, Crielaard, & Deng, ), while others have shown a higher impact of rougher surfaces with increasing amounts of bacteria, as biofilms become mature(Al‐Ahmad et al, ; John, Becker, & Schwarz, ). Further studies are needed to identify the critical point in biofilm development for surface topography to have a bigger impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was followed by the release of the commercially labeled MTA Angelus ® (Angelus Soluções Odontológicas, Londrina, Brazil). Nevertheless, potential drawbacks such as extended setting time, tooth discoloration, elevated cost, and challenging handling characteristics have emerged [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A moderately rough surface, as developed here [41], is also considered to favour osseointegration due to increased attachment of the blood clot and, later, of osteoblast precursor cells and thus bone ingrowth [1,33,40,42,43]. Whilst many microscopically rough surfaces allow formation of undesirable bacterial biofilms [11,12], an R a of 1-2 µm is considered to give the best compromise with regards to facilitating adhesion of hMSCs and ultimately osseointegration [41]. As such, the physical surface characteristics for the SLA Ti surfaces developed here could be expected to facilitate osseointegration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a high chance of peri-operative bacterial contamination from various sources [10]. Bacteria readily adhere to roughened implant surfaces [11,12] and can form biofilms, which disrupt osseointegration of the implant by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This has been hypothesised as one cause of early implant failures [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%