MicroCrack-Net: A Deep Neural Network With Outline Profile-Guided Feature Augmentation and Attention-Based Multiscale Fusion for MicroCrack Detection of Tantalum Capacitors

Cheng, Mingyang; Xu, Chuqiao; Wang, Junliang; Zhang, Wenjun; Zhou, Yaqin; Zhang, Jie

doi:10.1109/taes.2022.3181117

Cited by 12 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although different deep learning models were utilized to detect defects in different sectors [74,75], a few challenges persist due to the dependency of the performance on datasets [76]. Despite utilizing a small dataset, our findings showed an adequate performance when using one-stage models (YOLOv4-tiny, YOLOv5, and YOLOv8).…”

Section: Deep Learning Modelsmentioning

confidence: 72%

An Assessment of Human Inspection and Deep Learning for Defect Identification in Floral Wreaths

Caballero-Ramirez,

Baez-Lopez,

Limon-Romero

et al. 2023

Horticulturae

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quality assurance through visual inspection plays a pivotal role in agriculture. In recent years, deep learning techniques (DL) have demonstrated promising results in object recognition. Despite this progress, few studies have focused on assessing human visual inspection and DL for defect identification. This study aims to evaluate visual human inspection and the suitability of using DL for defect identification in products of the floriculture industry. We used a sample of defective and correct decorative wreaths to conduct an attribute agreement analysis between inspectors and quality standards. Additionally, we computed the precision, accuracy, and Kappa statistics. For the DL approach, a dataset of wreath images was curated for training and testing the performance of YOLOv4-tiny, YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and ResNet50 models for defect identification. When assessing five classes, inspectors showed an overall precision of 92.4% and an accuracy of 97%, just below the precision of 93.8% obtained using YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 with accuracies of 99.9% and 99.8%, respectively. With a Kappa value of 0.941, our findings reveal an adequate agreement between inspectors and the standard. The results evidence that the models presented a similar performance to humans in terms of precision and accuracy, highlighting the suitability of DL in assisting humans with defect identification in artisanal-made products from floriculture. Therefore, by assisting humans with digital technologies, organizations can embrace the full potential of Industry 4.0, making the inspection process more intelligent and reliable.

show abstract

Section: Deep Learning Modelsmentioning

confidence: 72%