2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00358-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcrystallization of indomethacin using a pH-shift method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same results were obtained in other studies for gliclazide (27), ibuprofen (29), itraconazole and ketoconazol (11), and indomethacine (16). The narrow and uniform size distribution of the particles is one of the important advantages of the microcrystallization process, in contrast with other particle size reduction methods such as milling (16).…”
Section: Particle Size Distribution Of Microcrystalssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same results were obtained in other studies for gliclazide (27), ibuprofen (29), itraconazole and ketoconazol (11), and indomethacine (16). The narrow and uniform size distribution of the particles is one of the important advantages of the microcrystallization process, in contrast with other particle size reduction methods such as milling (16).…”
Section: Particle Size Distribution Of Microcrystalssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, mechanical methods such as milling or grinding have inevitable drawbacks, including the tendency of the produced particles to agglomerate, reducing the available surface area (13). In addition, the potential for physical instability or chemical degradation from disruptions in the crystal lattice (14,15) and the high energy input makes this micronization method extremely inefficient (16). Several other methods have been introduced to produce micron-sized drug particles such as high-pressure homogenization (17), supercritical fluid micronization (18,19), liquid-solid techniques (20), and hydrosol formation (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical methods such as milling and grinding (4) are successful in particle size reduction; however, the particle size uniformity is not achieved. A common particle size reduction method for hydrophobic drugs is microcrystallization (5). The process is usually used to obtain small particles of the disruption of large crystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ micronization and microcrystallization are suitable methods for the production of micron-sized drugs (5)(6)(7). Compared with milled products, drug properties are optimized, the particle size is more uniformly distributed, and the powder is less cohesive (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Gliclazide (GL), 3-(7-azabicyclo [3.3.0] oct-7-yl)-1-(4-methylphenyl)sulfonylurea is a second-generation sulfonylurea, widely used for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include physical methods such as milling and grinding 1 , but it is difficult to obtain uniform fine particles and control the particle size of the drug. Microcrystallization of hydrophobic drugs is a technique to overcome these problems 2 . The process is usually used to obtain small particles by the disruption of large crystals Dissolution rate and bioavailability improvement by micronization of sparingly water-soluble drugs entail using jar mills and fluid energy mills 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%