MEMS sensors, actuators, and sub-systems can enable an important reduction in the size and mass of spacecrafts, first by replacing larger and heavier components, then by replacing entire subsystems, and finally by enabling the microfabrication of highly integrated picosats. Very small satellites (1 to 100 kg) stand to benefit the most from MEMS technologies. These small satellites are typically used for science or technology demonstration missions, with higher risk tolerance than multi-ton telecommunication satellites. While MEMS are playing a growing role on Earth in safetycritical applications, in the harsh and remote environment of space, reliability is still the crucial issue, and the absence of an accepted qualification methodology is holding back MEMS from wider use. An overview is given of the range of MEMS applications in space. An effective way to prove that MEMS can operate reliably in space is to use them in space: we illustrate how Cubesats (1 kg, 1 liter, cubic satellites in a standardized format to reduce launch costs) can serve as low-cost vectors for MEMS technology demonstration in space. The Cubesat SwissCube developed in Switzerland is used as one example of a rapid way to fly new microtechnologies, and also as an example of a spacecraft whose performance is only possible thanks to MEMS.Keywords: MEMS, spacecraft, satellites, nanosatellites, cubesats, space
OVERVIEW OF MEMS APPLICATIONS IN SPACEIn 2008 the market for MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems) devices was nearly $8 Billion according to Yole Développement [1]. MEMS encompass an enormous range of applications, from RF switching to projection display to inertial sensors to implantable pumps. Combining low mass, low power consumption, small volume and possible integration with control and sense electronics, MEMS seem ideal for space applications, where it costs approximately 10'000 $ to place one kg in low Earth orbit (LEO).Reliability is a key concern for spacecraft, in view of the very larger development costs, near impossibility of repair (the service missions to the Hubble Space Telescope are the notable exception), and limited launch slots. One major difference between operation on Earth and in Space is the radiation level [2]. Other space-specific reliability concerns are thermal cycling and thermal shocks, vibration and mechanical shock at launch and stage/heat shield separation, and operation in very high vacuum. The typical service life of a telecommunication satellite is 15 years, during which time the spacecraft must operate continuously and flawlessly. For this reason, and because of the need for radiation tolerance, new technologies are generally accepted in space applications only many years later than in consumer electronics, except for cases where a new technology is required for a mission, or allows dramatic performance enhancement or mass reduction. This was the case for instance for FPGAs and is now the case for MEMS.The fraction of the $8 Billion MEMS market for space is very small, and MEMS for use in space ...