2017
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfinance development in Armenia: Sectoral characteristics and problems

Abstract: The heavy-handed regulation enforced a commercialization process and as a result pushed microfinance institutions towards a commercial logic. This commercial shift, in its turn, diminished the importance of the social component.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microfinance sector development in Armenia can be grouped into several stages (Khachatryan & Avetisyan, 2017). Right after Armenia declared its independence in 1991, many international organizations and networks (for example, FINCA, OXFAM, UMCOR, World Vision) and religious charities (for example, Catholic Relief Services) initiated development programs in the country.…”
Section: Microfinance In Armenia and Sef Internationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfinance sector development in Armenia can be grouped into several stages (Khachatryan & Avetisyan, 2017). Right after Armenia declared its independence in 1991, many international organizations and networks (for example, FINCA, OXFAM, UMCOR, World Vision) and religious charities (for example, Catholic Relief Services) initiated development programs in the country.…”
Section: Microfinance In Armenia and Sef Internationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulatory support (Britzelmaier, Kraus, & Xu, 2013), the control of corruption, the need for competition, and the use of rating agencies (Halouani & Boujelbène, 2015), credit bureaus (Shankar, 2015), or even “mystery shopping” (Chan & Lin, 2015) can all help in the supervision and development of microfinance organizations. However, inappropriate regulation can push microcredit organizations to increase outreach and inclusion but with a purely commercial logic (Khachatryan & Avetisyan, 2017). Religious affiliation has not been found to impact the performance of microfinance institutions (Djan & Mersland, 2017).…”
Section: Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, questions related to the role played by regulation in the increased profit orientation of microfinance institutions have been left aside. Indeed, the role of regulation aimed at ensuring the financial sustainability of microfinance institutions may push these MFIs to resort to practices targeted toward maximizing profits at the expense of the financial inclusion of the poor (Gallardo et al, 2005; Khachatryan & Avestisyan, 2017; Siwale & Okoye, 2017). This literature suggests the relevance of policy reviews aimed to accommodate the needs of the microfinance sector.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Microfinance Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%