2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-018-2096-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic devices containing thin rock sections for oil recovery studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microfluidic Surface Chemistry : Most microfluidic visualization studies use devices made with PDMS, which may not adequately recapitulate the complex surface chemistry of real‐world porous media. However, advances continue to be made in the development of microfluidic channels etched directly into mineral substrates, thus enabling flow visualization in channels with surfaces made of real rock material . While this technology has been used to shed light on questions relating to chemical reactions in porous media, it has yet to be employed in studies of polymer solution flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic Surface Chemistry : Most microfluidic visualization studies use devices made with PDMS, which may not adequately recapitulate the complex surface chemistry of real‐world porous media. However, advances continue to be made in the development of microfluidic channels etched directly into mineral substrates, thus enabling flow visualization in channels with surfaces made of real rock material . While this technology has been used to shed light on questions relating to chemical reactions in porous media, it has yet to be employed in studies of polymer solution flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 Some studies have used crude oil to visualize multiphase flow, 30 32 while others have used model oils. 2 , 33 A missing link in microfluidic studies is that most studies only look at one variable. While this provides valuable in-depth knowledge of the matter, the results cannot be projected to other systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The waterflooding conditions explored using two microfluidic chips (with the same design) are summarized in Table 1. In IOR from oil fields, the typical injection velocity typically varies between 1 and 4 ft/day; some variations exist between literature values (Gerold et al 2018;Sarvestani et al 2019). Since the flow rates correspond to typical capillary numbers in the range 10 -6 to 10 -5 , (Guo et al 2015) we have also explored this range (Table 1).…”
Section: Waterflooding Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al (2017) designed a new microfluidic test bed called "Real Rock Microfluidic Flow Cell (RR-MFC)", wherein a 500 µm-thick North Sea reservoir rock sample was mounted inside a PDMS microfluidic channel. Gerold et al (2018) fabricated and used a microfluidic device called "Flow On Rock Device (FORD)" by directly integrating thin sections of reservoir rock into micro-fluidics for oil recovery studies. While these microfluidic chips should offer a closer correspondence with the (geo) chemical properties in real oil reservoirs, they have not been used with water and oil as co-existing phases in three dimensions to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%