2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic Shear Processing Control of Biological Reduction Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery

Abstract: We demonstrate microfluidic manufacturing of glutathione (GSH)-responsive polymer nanoparticles (PNPs) with controlled in vitro pharmacological properties for selective drug delivery. This work leverages previous fundamental work on microfluidic control of the physicochemical properties of GSH-responsive PNPs containing cleavable disulfide groups in two different locations (core and interface, DualM PNPs). In this paper, we employ a two-phase gas–liquid microfluidic reactor for the flow-directed manufacturing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final particles following removal of unencapsulated pDNA are designated PIHC micelles. Recent work from our group has demonstrated significant effects of on-chip shear forces in two-phase microfluidic reactors such as the one applied here (Figure ) on the structure and function of polymer-based materials for nanomedicine materials. Therefore, we were interested in comparing PIHC micelle samples prepared by the bulk and microfluidic SA2 processes in terms of their encapsulation efficiencies (EE), size distributions, and morphologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final particles following removal of unencapsulated pDNA are designated PIHC micelles. Recent work from our group has demonstrated significant effects of on-chip shear forces in two-phase microfluidic reactors such as the one applied here (Figure ) on the structure and function of polymer-based materials for nanomedicine materials. Therefore, we were interested in comparing PIHC micelle samples prepared by the bulk and microfluidic SA2 processes in terms of their encapsulation efficiencies (EE), size distributions, and morphologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is that the minor population of larger aggregates forms from excess individual PCL- b -PEG chains that do not coassemble with PCL-pDNA in the SA2 process (Figure B). Based on the predominance of small, low-polydispersity spheres, which are favorable for cell uptake and targeting, in addition to the greater reproducibility of pDNA encapsulation, we selected the microfluidic preparation method for further analysis, including in vitro cell experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The versatile HFF device, staggered herringbone micromixer, [105] two-phase gas-liquid microfluidic mixers (Figure 6b), [102,[106][107][108][109][110] automated microfluidic Asia 320 flow reactor, [111] the microfluidic coflow capillary device, [112] and impact-jet micromixers [113] have been developed to prepare the synthetic polymer NPs in recent years.…”
Section: Synthetic Polymer Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Acid-labile and disulfide linkages are the most studied cleavable linkages in the construction of SRD-exhibiting nanoassemblies. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] High redox potentials caused by the higher concentration of glutathione (GSH) in cancer cells, [17][18][19] as well as acidic pH of tumor tissue and endosomes/lysosomes, 20,21 have been exploited as endogenous triggers to destabilize ABP-based nanoassemblies and thus enhance the release of therapeutic agents. In addition, lightcleavable linkages such as o-nitrobenzyl and coumarin groups allow for the spatial and temporal control of release kinetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%