Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.05351-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such droplets are typically generated using a nebuliser (Koop et al 1998 ; Atkinson et al 2013 ; Knopf and Lopez 2009 ; Murray et al 2011 ), a non-trivial technique that produces polydisperse droplets, or via emulsification with a vortex mixer (Hader et al 2014 ; Wright et al 2013 ) that also yields polydisperse populations. Microfluidic technology (Tarn and Pamme 2013 ; Whitesides 2006 ; Sackmann et al 2014 ), on the other hand, enables the generation of very monodisperse droplets at high production rates for a range of applications (Casadevall i Solvas and de Mello 2011 ; Teh et al 2008 ; Song et al 2006 ; Chou et al 2015 ; Zhu and Wang 2017 ). This is typically achieved via the injection of oil and water into a T-junction or flow-focussing junction channel design such that droplets of one phase are generated in the other (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such droplets are typically generated using a nebuliser (Koop et al 1998 ; Atkinson et al 2013 ; Knopf and Lopez 2009 ; Murray et al 2011 ), a non-trivial technique that produces polydisperse droplets, or via emulsification with a vortex mixer (Hader et al 2014 ; Wright et al 2013 ) that also yields polydisperse populations. Microfluidic technology (Tarn and Pamme 2013 ; Whitesides 2006 ; Sackmann et al 2014 ), on the other hand, enables the generation of very monodisperse droplets at high production rates for a range of applications (Casadevall i Solvas and de Mello 2011 ; Teh et al 2008 ; Song et al 2006 ; Chou et al 2015 ; Zhu and Wang 2017 ). This is typically achieved via the injection of oil and water into a T-junction or flow-focussing junction channel design such that droplets of one phase are generated in the other (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic paper-based analytic devices (microPADs) are a relatively new class of paper-based devices that combine features from microfluidic, lateral flow, and dipstick devices [ 2 , 10 , 11 ]. Traditional microfluidic devices are made by etching or molding channels into glass, silicon, or poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and typically require pumps to move fluids through the device [ 12 , 13 ]. MicroPADs, on the other hand, are made by patterning hydrophilic porous membranes (e.g., paper) with hydrophobic barriers to create networks of hydrophilic channels and test zones in which aqueous samples can wick via capillary action [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of microfluidic devices [ 5 , 6 , 7 ], having channel networks with typical dimensions on the order of 1–100 s of micrometres, provides a number of advantages to immunoassays by reducing diffusion distances, reaction and washing time frames, as well as sample and reagent volumes [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Integration of magnetic particles with microfluidics thus combines the benefits of both [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], and has yielded great success for on-chip bioanalysis [ 12 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%