2016
DOI: 10.3917/mana.194.0248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfoundations of decoupling: From a coping theory perspective

Abstract: In neo-institutional theory literature, studies of decoupling have provided only a binary view of the employees of symbolic structures: ceremonial props or change agents. To obtain a richer view of the working life of these particular individuals, we rely on an instrumental case study to examine how they perceive a decoupling situation and do their job. Our fieldwork takes place in a multinational company, which adopts the vision and implements different tools and practices of knowledge management (KM), but a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, cultural–cognitive institutional pressure such as pressure from pro‐environmental interest groups can drive firms to symbolically discharge their responsibility towards the natural environment by adopting EMPs to defend, maintain or repair their organizational legitimacy (Haque & Ntim, 2018, 2022). This implies a causal effect from corporate environmental performance to EMPs and thus lends itself to the concept of greenwashing or decoupling, which involves creating and maintaining gaps between formal policies/structures that are ceremonially adopted and actual organizational practices (Vo et al, 2016, p. 248).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, cultural–cognitive institutional pressure such as pressure from pro‐environmental interest groups can drive firms to symbolically discharge their responsibility towards the natural environment by adopting EMPs to defend, maintain or repair their organizational legitimacy (Haque & Ntim, 2018, 2022). This implies a causal effect from corporate environmental performance to EMPs and thus lends itself to the concept of greenwashing or decoupling, which involves creating and maintaining gaps between formal policies/structures that are ceremonially adopted and actual organizational practices (Vo et al, 2016, p. 248).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It determines, through a dynamic and extensive data analysis, whether EMPs are effective or merely a legitimizing device. In popular parlance, the latter outcome is often referred to as “greenwash”, or “decoupling” in neo‐institutional theory (Graafland & Smid, 2016; Vo et al, 2016). It investigates the impact of 10 corporate environmental management practices on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and emissions intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also qualitative approaches to address microfoundational issues. See, for example,Vo, Culié, and Mounoud (2016). However, as this paper focuses on quantitative methods, the reader interested in the issue of qualitative methods can find more information in the review paper on microfoundational research byFelin et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%