Many ectotherms exhibit striking latitudinal gradients in lifespan. However, it is unclear whether lifespan gradients in distantly related taxa share a common mechanistic explanation. We compiled data on geographic variation in lifespan in ectotherms from around the globe to determine how much of this intraspecific variation in lifespan may be explained by temperature using the simple predictions of the metabolic theory of ecology. We found that the metabolic theory accurately predicts how lifespan varies with temperature within species in a wide range of ectotherms in both controlled laboratory experiments and free-living populations. After removing the effect of temperature, only a small fraction of species showed significant trends with latitude. There was, however, considerable residual intraspecific variation indicating that other, more local factors are likely to be important in determining lifespan within species. These findings suggest that, given predicted increases in global temperature, lifespan of ectotherms may be substantially shortened in the future.any phenotypic traits covary with latitude, particularly among ectotherms. For instance, relative to individuals from low latitudes, high-latitude individuals tend to have higher growth rates and larger body size (1, 2), produce larger eggs (3), have relatively shorter extremities (4), and more vertebrae (5). Lifespan also varies with latitude in a wide variety of ectotherms. For example, lifespan increases with latitude in the yellow clam (Mesodesma mactroides) (6), oegopsin squid (suborder Oegospina) (7), and many fish species (8-11). One example is particularly striking: pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) found in Spain (43°N) have maximum lifespans of 29 years, whereas those in Russia (66°N) live nearly 200 years (12, 13). The purpose of our study is to determine whether this ubiquitous geographical variation in lifespan has a common physiological basis in temperature.Temperature has long been known to influence lifespan (14, 15). For example, Drosophila melanogaster from Brazil raised at 31.2°C lived up to 29 days, whereas flies from the same population reared at 12°C lived up to 247 days (16). Although the temperature-lifespan relationship has been known for nearly a century, most of our knowledge on this relationship is derived from laboratory experiments on short-lived invertebrates (e.g., 17). Studies on natural variation in lifespan with temperature have largely been limited to cross-taxa comparisons (18,19). As a consequence, the role of temperature in controlling geographic variation in lifespan within species is unclear. It is easy to imagine how geographic variation in the abundance of predators, availability of resources, fluctuations in environmental conditions, and local adaptation might obscure any relationship between temperature and lifespan in wild populations.The metabolic theory of ecology (MTE) (20) has been used to link metabolism to a wide range of physiological and macroecological processes. Growth trajectories and l...