2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microglial and astrocytic changes in the striatum of methamphetamine abusers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, human imaging studies show reduced hippocampal volume, particularly gray matter volume, and decreased hippocampal responsiveness in chronic methamphetamine users (Thompson et al, 2004, Kim et al, 2010, Schwartz et al, 2010, Daumann et al, 2011, Nakama et al, 2011, Orikabe et al, 2011, Morales et al, 2012), indicating maladaptive hippocampal networking in methamphetamine-exposed individuals. Postmortem analyses in human brain tissue confirms that chronic methamphetamine use produces neurotoxicity in the hippocampus (Kitamura, 2009, Kitamura et al, 2010), which suggests an association between hippocampal dysfunction and toxicity in methamphetamine addicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For example, human imaging studies show reduced hippocampal volume, particularly gray matter volume, and decreased hippocampal responsiveness in chronic methamphetamine users (Thompson et al, 2004, Kim et al, 2010, Schwartz et al, 2010, Daumann et al, 2011, Nakama et al, 2011, Orikabe et al, 2011, Morales et al, 2012), indicating maladaptive hippocampal networking in methamphetamine-exposed individuals. Postmortem analyses in human brain tissue confirms that chronic methamphetamine use produces neurotoxicity in the hippocampus (Kitamura, 2009, Kitamura et al, 2010), which suggests an association between hippocampal dysfunction and toxicity in methamphetamine addicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These findings suggest that some of the pathological changes in certain brain regions might be reversible and have gradually diminished following extended abstinence from Meth (Volkow et al 2001; Wang et al 2004; Nordahl et al 2005; Sekine et al 2008; Salo et al 2011; Yang et al 2015). It is also possible that some of the brain pathological changes examined in this study (Soontornniyomkij et al 2016) might not have been induced by Meth in the first place (Kitamura et al 2010; Tong et al 2014). It is possible that susceptibility to Meth neurotoxicity might vary from region to region in the CNS (Wang et al 2004; Kuhn et al 2011).…”
Section: Neuropathologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recent studies have suggested that METH is a neurotoxic drug that can cause pathological changes and death in neuronal and glial cells (Thompson et al, 2004;Kitamura et al, 2007Kitamura et al, , 2010Takeichi et al, 2012). METH induces glial cell hyperactivity and death via many pathways, including apoptosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, interruption of mitochondrial function, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stress responses (Tocharus et al, 2010;Jumnongprakhon et al, 2014Jumnongprakhon et al, , 2015Shah and Kumar, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%