2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micrograph evidence of meniscus solidification and sub-surface microstructure evolution in continuous-cast ultralow-carbon steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hook formation has been analyzed extensively by Thomas et al [6] and Sengupta and colleagues [7,27] through a model that reconstructs the hook's shape based on micrographs and animations. These micrographs show dendritic growth at both sides of the original meniscus line confirming the immersion and overflow process.…”
Section: Hook Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hook formation has been analyzed extensively by Thomas et al [6] and Sengupta and colleagues [7,27] through a model that reconstructs the hook's shape based on micrographs and animations. These micrographs show dendritic growth at both sides of the original meniscus line confirming the immersion and overflow process.…”
Section: Hook Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is primarily because of the fact that the progressively increasing emphasis on the quality of continuously-cast (CC) products mandates much tighter control of solidification process variables and would require a more precise definition of the relationship between cast microstructure and process parameters. Although some studies to quantify the dendritic morphology in the continuous casting situation have been reported, [19][20][21][22][23][24] information regarding correlation of the cast microstructure, viz. dendrite arm spacings (DASs), with solidification variables and operational parameters in industrial scale, CC high-carbon steel billets/slabs is still very much limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now-a-days, newer and more sophisticated evaluation techniques are available and have become quite popular. 16,17) However, in the present work, samples for chemical analysis were obtained by the conventional drilling technique where the appropriate drill size was selected on the basis of the average size of segregation spots observed in the S-print. Drill intervals along the billet axis were also decided on basis of observed segregation profiles in the Sprints of the longitudinal section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%