2020
DOI: 10.1080/24705357.2020.1858724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microhabitat selection by macroinvertebrates: generality among rivers and functional interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
44
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
8
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow velocity was associated with 11 taxa (43%), with a positive effect on Rhithrogena spp., known as a genus of rheophilic crawlers (Dolédec et al, 2007;Tachet et al, 2010). This result is consistent with the study by Forcellini et al (2022) Concerning hydrology, summer flow was selected in 43% of models with negative associations with eight taxa from various orders (e.g. Baetis spp., Protonemura spp., Ceratopogoninae, Oligochaeta).…”
Section: Taxon Responses Underpin the Relative Ecological Effects Of ...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Flow velocity was associated with 11 taxa (43%), with a positive effect on Rhithrogena spp., known as a genus of rheophilic crawlers (Dolédec et al, 2007;Tachet et al, 2010). This result is consistent with the study by Forcellini et al (2022) Concerning hydrology, summer flow was selected in 43% of models with negative associations with eight taxa from various orders (e.g. Baetis spp., Protonemura spp., Ceratopogoninae, Oligochaeta).…”
Section: Taxon Responses Underpin the Relative Ecological Effects Of ...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…We speculate that this phenomenon shows that the response pattern of entire macroinvertebrate assemblages was essentially a weighted combination of each taxon (Wright, 1995), and was modified by individual taxon as well as inter‐taxa interactions within assemblages (Feng et al., 2017). To be specific, when the entire assemblages were examined, the presence of some taxa was favored by flow ( Brachycentrus and Limnophila in this study) while others ( Polypedilum in this study) were not, thus compensation among all the taxa yielded a final unimodal response (Forcellini et al., 2020). Therefore, the “optimal” flow obtained in this study could not yield a flow condition most suitable for all the taxa within assemblages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages in a river could be largely explained by the patch‐scale flow condition (Fornaroli et al., 2019). Individual species often show a significant relationship with variables associated to flow (e.g., shear stress, average velocity, Froude number; Dolédec et al., 2007; Shearer et al., 2015), and flow preferences may differ among species, as indicated by differences in species abundance (Forcellini et al., 2020). In addition to changes in abundance, macroinvertebrates commonly display morphological and biological adaptations to flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another feature is that many normal fishways do not have riverbed material at the bottom. However, riverbed materials are essential for bottom-dwelling fish species and other benthic organisms [7,[42][43][44][45][46]. Thus, installing other types of fishways with gentle slopes and riverbed materials is crucial for preserving the biodiversity of the river channel [3,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%