2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-012-0010-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microhabitat use of juvenile coral reef fish in Palau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that the coverage of live corals did not necessarily have positive associations with the spatial distribution of groupers. Ticzon et al (2012) showed similar results, indicating that a greater density of C. argus, C. urodeta, and V. louti was found on non-coralline substrates than live corals. Thus, larger-scale habitat characteristics (exposed reefs vs. inner reefs) might be better explanatory factor influencing the species-specific spatial distribution of groupers.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Groupersmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results indicate that the coverage of live corals did not necessarily have positive associations with the spatial distribution of groupers. Ticzon et al (2012) showed similar results, indicating that a greater density of C. argus, C. urodeta, and V. louti was found on non-coralline substrates than live corals. Thus, larger-scale habitat characteristics (exposed reefs vs. inner reefs) might be better explanatory factor influencing the species-specific spatial distribution of groupers.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Groupersmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A higher density of benthic crustaceans was primarily found on non-coralline substrates (dead coral and coral rubble) rather than live corals ( Kramer, Bellwood & Bellwood, 2014 ), and predators of crustaceans ( e.g ., wrasse) also used non-coralline substrates as feeding microhabitats ( Kramer, Bellwood & Bellwood, 2016 ). Some studies have shown that smaller-sized fish, which are potential prey items for groupers ( e.g ., pomacentrids and juveniles of other taxa), are associated with both live corals and non-coralline substrates ( Wilson et al, 2008 , 2010 ; Ticzon et al, 2012 ; Giffin, Rueger & Jones, 2019 ). These results suggest that foraging sites for the seven grouper species are not restricted to live corals and this might be why the spatial distribution of groupers was not necessarily associated with the coverage of live corals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change in coral assemblage structure as Acropora lost alters size distribution and abundance of shelter for prey fish [115]. Selection acts on prey that are better adapted to the new refuge environment which in turn leads to selection of predators able to forage for such prey [116].…”
Section: Ecological Inheritancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous coral reef fish species utilize substrates with a high structural complexity as habitats and refuge spaces ( Luckhurst & Luckhurst, 1978 ; Ménard et al, 2012 ; Richardson et al, 2017 ; Oren et al, 2023 ). Species-specific habitat associations to specific substrates or structural complexities have also been reported ( Wilson et al, 2008 ; Ticzon et al, 2012 ; Untersteggaber, Mitteroecker & Herler, 2014 ; Nanami, 2023 ). Such species-specific habitat associations have been shown to influence populations through survivorship ( Fakan et al, 2024 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%