1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(98)00417-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microindentation measurements of glassy carbon implanted with high-energy titanium ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work on ion species implanted in GC include Be [8], Cs [9], Sr [10], Co [11] K [12], Na [13], Ti [14], N [15], W [16] but after extensive literature research no data for diffusion studies of Cd implanted in GC was found. Most of these studies investigated the improvement of mechanical properties of GC surface layer after ion implantation [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on ion species implanted in GC include Be [8], Cs [9], Sr [10], Co [11] K [12], Na [13], Ti [14], N [15], W [16] but after extensive literature research no data for diffusion studies of Cd implanted in GC was found. Most of these studies investigated the improvement of mechanical properties of GC surface layer after ion implantation [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For GC to be a good candidate for containment, it must be a good diffusion barrier for fission products and its near-surface region structure must remain unchanged so that it retains its properties after In implantation, annealing and even after swift heavy ion (SHI) irradiation. Previous work on ion species implanted in GC include Be [18], Cs [19], Sr [20], Co [4] K [21], Na [15], Ti [22], N [23], W [17], Cd [24] but after extensive literature research no study of In implanted in GC has been carried out and no study on SHI irradiation of implanted GC has been previously conducted. The diffusion coefficient calculated in this study after isochronal annealing has been compared to that of beryllium implanted into GC calculated by Koskelo et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because conventional mold materials such as silicon (or silicon oxide) and nickel are not suitable for glass forming (due to their poor heat resistance and difficulty of release after imprinting), there is a great demand for a new mold material with properties (such as hardness and thermal expansion coefficient) more suitable for the glass imprint application. A glassy carbon (GC) with a wide range of applications, such as electrodes, sliding parts and biomaterials (Kuhnke et al 2005, Nakao et al 1998, Iwashita et al 2001, is one of the promising candidates because it has high operating temperature (2000 • C), chemical stability, high hardness, wear resistance and gas impermeability. Moreover, the replicated glass structure can be easily removed from the GC mold after imprinting since the cohesion between GC and glasses is generally poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%