1982
DOI: 10.1097/00004347-198201000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microinvasive Carcinoma of the Vulva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional measuring method was chosen mainly based on practical issues 11 ; the adjacent dermal papilla can be found in all sites of the vulva, is not altered by variations in the depth of rete ridges, and the measurement is not significantly influenced by hyperkeratosis, tumor surface ulceration, or adjacent epithelial hyperplasia. Wilkinson et al 16 considered different measuring methods in one of his first studies about microinvasive carcinomas of the vulva and states that the difficulty in measuring from the deepest rete ridge (the alternative method used in this study) is that the overlying epithelium at the site of the neoplasm may itself be neoplastic and would be a variable site of measurement. The problem of variability can be argued; in our study no cases with the invasive overlying epithelium were seen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional measuring method was chosen mainly based on practical issues 11 ; the adjacent dermal papilla can be found in all sites of the vulva, is not altered by variations in the depth of rete ridges, and the measurement is not significantly influenced by hyperkeratosis, tumor surface ulceration, or adjacent epithelial hyperplasia. Wilkinson et al 16 considered different measuring methods in one of his first studies about microinvasive carcinomas of the vulva and states that the difficulty in measuring from the deepest rete ridge (the alternative method used in this study) is that the overlying epithelium at the site of the neoplasm may itself be neoplastic and would be a variable site of measurement. The problem of variability can be argued; in our study no cases with the invasive overlying epithelium were seen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The trouble point of this statement was the method of measuring the depth of invasion. 9 At least 5 methods for vertical measurement of a vulvar squamous cell carcinoma were referred to the ISGYP committee with different landmarks used for calculation. 7 Wilkinson first proposed the definition of depth of invasion as the measurement of the tumor from the epithelial stromal (dermal) junction of the adjacent most superficial dermal papillae to the deepest point of invasion, and distinguished the depth of invasion measurement from the thickness of the tumor 7,9 (Fig.…”
Section: Rationale and Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wegen besonderer Bedeutung für die Ausbreitung und die Therapieplanung ist die präzise Angabe der Invasionstiefe erforderlich. Als Definition haben sich die ISGP und die ISSVD auf die Entfernung zwischen der tiefsten Invasion zur höchsten benachbarten Papille geeinigt [65].…”
Section: Invasives Karzinomunclassified
“…Ist das Karzinom bei einer jüngeren Frau in der Nähe der Klitoris lokalisiert, sodass die Sicherheitszone von 1 cm nicht mit einem Erhalt der Klitoris vereinbar wäre, so ist in einem Zentrum mit spezieller Erfahrung unter optimaler histopathologischer Kontrolle ein Kompromiss möglich. Erst wenn die Infiltrationstiefe von 1,0 mm überschritten ist, so ist eine inguinofemorale Lymphknotendissektion erforderlich [5,8,23,37,65]. Bei klar einseitiger Lokalisation des Karzinoms ist eine ausschließlich ipsilaterale Lymphknotendissektion möglich, da sich bei dieser Situation nur sehr selten (<1%) Metastasen in den kontralateralen Leistenlymphknoten finden [7].…”
Section: Stadium T1unclassified