2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical correlation between elasticity and strength characteristics of anisotropic rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sedimentary or metamorphic rocks, the layering of minerals strongly a↵ects joint family characteristics, bonds, and fissuring (i.e., an inherent geometrical anisotropy is imprinted in these materials by formation, tear and wear). Ultimately, the mechanical behavior of anisotropic rocks may strongly vary due to the layering properties and the loading orientation on rock samples [1][2][3][4][5]. Typically, the failure strength of rock cores presenting an anisotropic inner structure is tested under diametral point load, also known as the brazilian test in which the loading orientation is varied from totally aligned to the layering up to orthogonal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In sedimentary or metamorphic rocks, the layering of minerals strongly a↵ects joint family characteristics, bonds, and fissuring (i.e., an inherent geometrical anisotropy is imprinted in these materials by formation, tear and wear). Ultimately, the mechanical behavior of anisotropic rocks may strongly vary due to the layering properties and the loading orientation on rock samples [1][2][3][4][5]. Typically, the failure strength of rock cores presenting an anisotropic inner structure is tested under diametral point load, also known as the brazilian test in which the loading orientation is varied from totally aligned to the layering up to orthogonal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, numerical methods, mostly based on the discrete-element approach, have been employed to model and analyze the behavior of anisotropic rock given its capabilities of reproducing failure and crushing (see, for instance, Refs. [5,6]). These methods have added valuable information concerning the modeling and failure mechanism of anisotropic brittle structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sedimentary or metamorphic rocks, the layering of minerals strongly affects joint family characteristics, bonds, and fissuring (i.e., an inherent geometrical anisotropy is imprinted in these materials by formation, tear and wear). Ultimately, the mechanical behavior of anisotropic rocks may strongly vary due to the layering properties and the loading orientation on rock samples [1][2][3][4][5]. Typically, the failure strength of rock cores presenting an anisotropic inner structure is tested under diametral point load, also known as the brazilian test in which the loading orientation is varied from totally aligned to the layering up to orthogonal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If any of those fabric properties present a preferred orientation or organization in space, then the material can be considered inherently anisotropic. Many studies have focused on the quantification of the level of inherent fabric anisotropy in rocks or on the impact of the loading orientation on the ultimate strength of such layered materials (Hoek, 1964;Oda, 1982;Amadei, 1996;Chen et al, 1998;Zhang and Einstein, 2000;Karakul et al, 2010;Khanlari et al, 2015;Guha Roy and Singh, 2016;Pouragha et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rocks not presenting an inherent anisotropy, the failure strength is independent of the loading orientation . However, for highly layered rocks such as slate, schist or shale, the failure strength largely varies with in a 'U' shape with minimal strength for an orientation around ≃ 25 • , and increasing strength as → 0 • or 90 • (Amadei, 1996;Saroglou and Tsiambaos, 2008;Karakul et al, 2010;Saeidi et al, 2014;Garagon and Çan, 2010;Pouragha et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2020). As shown early by Hoek in 1964, the 'U' shape is consistent with Griffith's theory of brittle fracture of materials, in which the maximum stress at the tip of the crack triggers the propagation of a fissure once a critical amount of energy is added to the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%