2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical Landscape of Three-Dimensional Disordered Graphene Networks

Abstract: Disordered carbons can be considered under the modeling framework of disordered graphene networks (DGNs) due to the continuous three-dimensional connectivity and high graphitization. Correlating microstructures and mechanical behaviors of DGNs to their topology is pivotal to revealing more intrinsic features hidden by disorder. Herein, starting from basic deformations and topology, we investigate DGNs with various densities to explore their micromechanical landscape. Both the tension and shear of DGNs exhibit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Figure S3, Supporting Information). [20][21][22] For better understanding, typical structural features in H-TPGC have been marked and modelled in the HRTEM image as illustrated in Figure 1a: 1) Randomly interleaved structures are called topological structures (region I); the voids surrounded by multiple layers of long-range graphene nanoribbons wound around each other are called topological cavities/tunnels (region II); The starting point of the multidirectional connection of long-range graphene nanoribbons is referred to as a topological junction (region III), these three structural models could observe from different views of the multilayer Mobius torus structure which shown in Figure 1b. Moreover, the 3D model of H-TPGCs (Figure S4, Supporting Information) derived by the HRTEM also demonstrate above conclusion.…”
Section: Structure Of Topological Graphitized Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figure S3, Supporting Information). [20][21][22] For better understanding, typical structural features in H-TPGC have been marked and modelled in the HRTEM image as illustrated in Figure 1a: 1) Randomly interleaved structures are called topological structures (region I); the voids surrounded by multiple layers of long-range graphene nanoribbons wound around each other are called topological cavities/tunnels (region II); The starting point of the multidirectional connection of long-range graphene nanoribbons is referred to as a topological junction (region III), these three structural models could observe from different views of the multilayer Mobius torus structure which shown in Figure 1b. Moreover, the 3D model of H-TPGCs (Figure S4, Supporting Information) derived by the HRTEM also demonstrate above conclusion.…”
Section: Structure Of Topological Graphitized Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, such a conceptual model is too rough to accurately reflect the structural complexity of hard carbon. To some extent, the framework of hard carbon can also be regarded as 3D disordered graphene networks, where some intrinsic topological features are often hidden in these formless fragments with a lack of clear understanding. For the specific case of hard carbon anodes used in SIBs, one of the greatest challenges is the in-depth cognition of the Na-storage behaviors and their associated structural changes . Up to now, some powerful analytical techniques [such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)] have been extensively reported to characterize the morphology and structure of hard carbon. However, one must acknowledge that the abovementioned characterization methods can obtain some structural parameters and carbon morphology, but cannot provide the large-scale atomistic representations and even the structure–property correlations of hard carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultimate strengths of cellular‐ and gradient‐inspired samples are around 1000 MPa with a relatively low density ( ρ = 0.1 g cm −3 ). Figure 10c shows the Ashby plot for specific strength versus failure strain for the proposed bioinspired carbon‐based metamaterials along with a variety of other materials, including commercially available bulk materials, graphene, carbon fibers, [ 70 ] micro‐sized pyrolytic carbon, [ 71,72 ] disordered carbon networks, [ 73 ] and polycrystalline diamond. [ 74 ] The specific strength of tubular‐, fibrous‐, layered‐, and suture‐inspired carbon‐based metamaterials outperform all other materials displayed in the chart, occupying a hitherto unexplored space in the Ashby diagram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%