“…Figure 15 depicted an experimental comparison of the thermal and frictional properties of the new and worn lining materials (i.e., after a distance of 50,000 km), as it demonstrated that the temperature of the new material is higher than the worn because the latter has a higher coefficient of friction, which means a higher rate of heat generation, and also that the temperature increased with increasing time. The studied friction materials varied remarkably to try to reach the best thermal behavior of the clutch lining, for example, Ramesh et al 55 used different materials (VH‐03, G95, SF‐CPX61, and SF‐MC2), Koranteng et al 50 relied on a Cu‐based composite, Bhaduri and MuruguNachippan 35 worked on comparing several materials (molded asbestos, sintered iron, Al‐MMC F3D20S‐T5, Al‐MMC F3S20S‐T61), while fiber‐reinforced hybrid composites have been studied by Biczó et al, 54 Bhandari and Mane 46 focused on aluminum alloy (A‐360), and Harish and Kumar 56 compared three materials (asbestos, Kevlar 29, sintered iron).…”