2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical quantification of elastic, twinning, and slip strain partitioning exhibited by polycrystalline, monoclinic nickel–titanium during large uniaxial deformations measured via in-situ neutron diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
7
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding, together with the nearly full recovery of strain while holding at 0 load, indicate that in this condition the resistance of the material to passing transformation fronts is small. In fact, the microstructure appears to be assisting transformation at a rate that is much slower than the bulk deformation strain rate of 5 9 10 -4 , and also much slower than would be expected of a simple slip or twinning-related Bauschinger effect, such as those previously observed in monoclinic NiTi [34] as well as B2 and mixtures of B2 ? B19' NiTi [35] at analogous unloading rates.…”
Section: Effects Of Tensile Pre-strain Between 8 and 10 %mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding, together with the nearly full recovery of strain while holding at 0 load, indicate that in this condition the resistance of the material to passing transformation fronts is small. In fact, the microstructure appears to be assisting transformation at a rate that is much slower than the bulk deformation strain rate of 5 9 10 -4 , and also much slower than would be expected of a simple slip or twinning-related Bauschinger effect, such as those previously observed in monoclinic NiTi [34] as well as B2 and mixtures of B2 ? B19' NiTi [35] at analogous unloading rates.…”
Section: Effects Of Tensile Pre-strain Between 8 and 10 %mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It could be due to (1) deformation twinning or (2) merely due to more of the martensite formed of {110} A grains being retained, while more of the martensite of {211} A grains transformed back during unloading. However, these orientations are not related by {112} A , [24] and e_(hkl) were used to calculate changes of the residual stress component in the load direction for each of the reflections {113} A , or {114} A compound twinning, the most favorable and previously observed B2 twin systems for Nitinol [34,[38][39][40]. Therefore, these observations are probably due to the transformation mechanism.…”
Section: Effects Of Tensile Pre-strain Between 8 and 10 %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b and d) and no plastic strain was observed during the initial loading to 1 GPa. The strong tension-compression asymmetry is due to differences in martensitic variant selection (variant reorientation and detwinning) in tension and compression deformation modes as was observed in binary NiTi alloy [22,23]. This deformation strain, 3.7% in tension and 2.2% in compression at 1 GPa stress, is a combination of elastic strain and inelastic martensite variant reorientation/detwinning, but no discernible stress plateau or demarcation between the two mechanisms was observed.…”
Section: Isothermal Behavior E Tension and Compressionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Some key performance issues include the potential for structural fatigue, whereby cracks may nucleate and lead to component failure [52] and also functional fatigue, whereby cyclic strain may accumulate under a sustained macroscopic stress from a variety of mechanisms in the martensite phase [53] as well as plasticity in the austenite phase [54][55][56][57], particularly at elevated temperature [58]. For Al matrix composites, such cyclic straining can arise from a mismatch in coefficients of thermal expansion, even in the absence of any phase transformations [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%