2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-020-01023-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanics of hydraulic fracturing and damage in rock based on DEM modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The auxiliary installation device for rock bolt drilling In the 20th century, Cundall et al [12][13][14] proposed the discrete element method (DEM), and simulated the conveying performance of screw conveyor for the first time through DEM. Nowadays, DEM has become the main application method for simulating screw conveying, and it is also widely used in geotechnical field, [15][16][17] mining field, [18][19][20] chemical field, [21][22][23] and agricultural field. [24][25][26] With the continuous improvement and development of the DEM, it has been widely used in the field of bit research to construct different drilling environments through DEM, and then analyze the particle movement in the drilling process.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auxiliary installation device for rock bolt drilling In the 20th century, Cundall et al [12][13][14] proposed the discrete element method (DEM), and simulated the conveying performance of screw conveyor for the first time through DEM. Nowadays, DEM has become the main application method for simulating screw conveying, and it is also widely used in geotechnical field, [15][16][17] mining field, [18][19][20] chemical field, [21][22][23] and agricultural field. [24][25][26] With the continuous improvement and development of the DEM, it has been widely used in the field of bit research to construct different drilling environments through DEM, and then analyze the particle movement in the drilling process.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEM divides the research object into multiple units, 19 links each unit together through contact, and displays the overall mechanical characteristics by analyzing the contact between each unit 20 . Therefore, DEM method has drawbacks in describing the action of fluid on solid 21,22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Therefore, DEM method has drawbacks in describing the action of fluid on solid. 21,22 In addition to these mentioned, there are phase field model and cohesive element method, which have been proven effective tools for modeling fracture initiation, propagation, coalescence, and branching in solids. [23][24][25] The FDEM can not only reflect the advantages of high computational efficiency of the finite element method but also study the heterogeneous characteristics of rocks like the DEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this methodological framework, two primary approaches are prominent: the Particle Flow Method [15] and the Block Discrete Element Method [16,17]. The Particle Flow Method is particularly suited for delving into the micromechanics of rock masses [18], while the Block Discrete Element Method finds its applicability in the intermediate realm, bridging the gap between continuous medium and particle discrete body analyses [19,20]. To enhance the simulation of fracture behavior within rock masses, a novel approach, the Bonded Block Model (BBM), has been introduced and integrated into 3DEC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%