2002
DOI: 10.1002/1439-2054(20020301)287:3<163::aid-mame163>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanisms of Tack of Soft Adhesives Based on Styrenic Block Copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
94
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An identical debonding mechanism was observed for all tack experiments with our model adhesives. Therefore, the measured values of force and displacement can be quantitatively compared between different films produced from different latexes [15,35,49]. The average values of the main quantitative parameters that can be extracted from the probe tack tests are illustrated in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An identical debonding mechanism was observed for all tack experiments with our model adhesives. Therefore, the measured values of force and displacement can be quantitatively compared between different films produced from different latexes [15,35,49]. The average values of the main quantitative parameters that can be extracted from the probe tack tests are illustrated in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 and 10, respectively) showed very marked variation among the model PSAs assessed. In the debonding regime where failure occurs by progressive propagation of interfacial cracks as is the case here, the value of ε max is directly related to adhesion energy [35,52] and this is obvious by comparing Figs. 9 and 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,20,24,25 Hence, the large and dominant contribution of deformation of an adhesive material during the debonding process renders impossible prediction of adhesive strength based only on data regarding interfacial interactions. 26 The contribution of interfacial interactions to the total work of debonding of PSAs by a peel test is often around 1% but can be as low as 0.05% for a PSA with specific supramolecular structure, 24,27,28 while the major part of the total work of adhesive joint failure is due to the work of viscoelastic deformation of the adhesive material during failure of the bond. 15 In other words, the strength of an adhesive joint evaluated by the probe tack and peel tests characterizes the viscoelastic properties of the adhesive material, rather than the tack.…”
Section: Introduction: Theories Of Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] Following these advances, Lindner and Maevis 10 have studied the failure over time of acrylic PSA layers loaded to the subcritical stress level that does not cause immediate failure. Interestingly, they found that the failure under low load did not occur by a progressive creep of the adhesive but by the nucleation of cavities and their progressive growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%