2002
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.128.1.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micrometastatic Tumor Detection in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract: Circulating tumor cells were identified in almost half of the patients using the ICC assay. In a literature review, we were not able to identify previous reports of circulating tumor cell detection in patients with HNSCC from peripheral blood samples using ICC or identify any study that has attempted to quantify circulating tumor cell levels. Although the clinical implications of circulating tumor cells in micrometastatic tumor detection in patients with HNSCC are still unknown, they may be significant. Long-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of techniques have been employed to identify these tumour cells including immunocytochemistry, typically using antibodies to detect cytokeratins, and RT-PCR analysis using total RNA extracted from the nucleated cell fraction in whole blood and lineage specific markers [8,29-32]. More recently, methods for the positive or negative enrichment of tumour cells, prior to detection using PCR and RT-PCR assays, have reduced the rate of false positivity from illegitimate expression of some more commonly used markers in normal blood cells [33-35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques have been employed to identify these tumour cells including immunocytochemistry, typically using antibodies to detect cytokeratins, and RT-PCR analysis using total RNA extracted from the nucleated cell fraction in whole blood and lineage specific markers [8,29-32]. More recently, methods for the positive or negative enrichment of tumour cells, prior to detection using PCR and RT-PCR assays, have reduced the rate of false positivity from illegitimate expression of some more commonly used markers in normal blood cells [33-35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although computed tomography, MRI, tissue/sentinel lymph node biopsy, and serum cancer marker analysis can all detect some level of residual disease, the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is reported to correlate most sensitively with cancer progression and metastasis (1,2). Measurement of CTCs, however, remains difficult, with most methods relying on quantitation of cells expressing epithelial markers after their isolation from peripheral blood samples (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Noninvasive imaging of these CTCs in real time as they flow through the peripheral vasculature could improve detection sensitivity by enabling analysis of significantly larger blood volumes (potentially the entire blood volume of the patient), but to date such analyses have proven successful only when cancer cells are labeled ex vivo before their i.v.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple blood test would, in contrast to bone marrow aspiration, allow for the analysis to be frequently repeated and thus used for staging at diagnosis as well as for therapy monitoring and long-term patient management. Using sensitive molecular and cell-based methods, OTCs have been successfully detected and isolated from blood in various solid malignancies, such as breast, prostate, colorectal, pancreatic, ovarian, and head and neck cancers, as well as malignant melanoma (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). However, the frequency of positive samples in studies of different cancers varies considerably, ranging between 95% in untreated breast cancer (12) and 12% in ovarian cancer (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of OTCs in peripheral blood specimens of solid malignancies has yet to be determined. Reported numbers of cell-based assays range from as low as 0.2 of 10 7 in head and neck cancer (17) to as high as 150 of 10 6 in ovarian cancer (13). Identifying and enumerating very rare tumor cells by microscopy is highly laborious, and the accuracy and sensitivity of the analysis is potentially impacted by the fatigue of the reviewer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%