2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2021.3091501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris Impact Detection and Location Based on FBG Sensor Network Using Combined Artificial Neural Network and Mahalanobis Distance Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 9 that the synthetical anomaly index of faulty 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 FBG sensors is significantly higher than that of the other normal 25 FBG sensors. Furthermore, according to Equation (8) and Figure 9, we can know that too many abnormal or faulty points could cause excessive discrete distribution of leading to poor detection results. Then, the anomaly and faulty coefficients 1 t and 2 t are bound to make further adjustments according to the discrete degree of features.…”
Section: Typical Fault Simulation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure 9 that the synthetical anomaly index of faulty 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 FBG sensors is significantly higher than that of the other normal 25 FBG sensors. Furthermore, according to Equation (8) and Figure 9, we can know that too many abnormal or faulty points could cause excessive discrete distribution of leading to poor detection results. Then, the anomaly and faulty coefficients 1 t and 2 t are bound to make further adjustments according to the discrete degree of features.…”
Section: Typical Fault Simulation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for effective structural component monitoring [4][5][6]. Furthermore, it is well known that FBG multiplexing technology is commonly used to connect a number of FBG sensors in series, which could share the same light source and demodulation system [7,8]. It also reduces the size of the network circuit and improves space usage [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the main detection methods around the impact source localization problem focus on the infrared imaging method [ 7 , 8 ], resistive thin film method [ 9 ], fiber grating method [ 10 , 11 ], acceleration method [ 12 ], and the acoustic detection method [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Among them, acoustic detection methods have been widely focused on due to the advantages of high system integration, high sensitivity, and fast detection speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse problem analysis method is not affected by acoustic wave propagation and does not require sensors with high dynamic performance, making it an excellent method for impact localization. Commonly used positioning sensors include polyvinylidene fluoride [8,9], piezoelectric [10,11], fiber optic fiber Bragg grating (FBG) [12][13][14][15][16]. Traditional electrical sensors have limitations such as difficulty in multiplexing, heavy cable weight, and susceptibility to electromagnetic interference, which restrict their application in aviation impact measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shrestha et al [13] placed four FBG sensors along a 45 • direction on the four corners of a composite plate, using an impact localization algorithm including elimination of error outliers and achieved an average error of about 20 mm. Jin et al [14] placed four sensors along the horizontal direction outside the detection area, using the martingale, distance and impact point coordinates as inputs and outputs for an artificial neural network. Ding et al [15] arranged 8 FBGs in the center of 4 corners and 4 edges of a composite plate, using Db3-wavelet threshold noise reduction, the average error is 8.19 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%