JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Ecology. 304 Montane and lowland forest in Ecuador. II. Climate Schulz 1960), Trinidad (Pittendrigh 1948, 1950), Colombia (Bates 1944; Baynton et al. 1965) and Mexico (Goodnight & Goodnight 1956). Only Schulz (1960) published comprehensive data for extended periods; most of the other workers published only scattered data for odd days or very short periods and we cannot make very useful comparisons with their results. Records for single weeks in several situations in an Upper Montane Forest (ridges, ravines, etc.) have been published by Shreve (1914) for Jamaica. It appears that no record has been published for the forests in the Amazon basin or those on the Andes. Regarding the atmospheric conditions prevailing in montane forests, very few detailed studies have been published for any part of the tropics. Apart from Shreve (1914), only Brown (1919) has given a detailed quantitative account. It is desirable to have details of the microclimate both in the undergrowth, where all but the most light-demanding trees regenerate, and in the upper levels of the forest canopy, where the tallest species mature. We use 'canopy' to describe the sum total of the crowns of the trees of all heights and not in the sense of Richards (1952, p. 23) of a 'more or less continuous layer of tree crowns of approximately even height'. A knowledge of conditions in both situations is also needed in relation to epiphytes since these are found at all levels in the canopy at both our forest sites (Grubb et al. 1963). Ideally one should record temperature and relative humidity from a number of positions in each forest because one may expect various patterns in the distribution of their characteristics, rather as for penetration of rainfall (Hoppe 1896; Kittredge 1948; Hopkins 1965) or of radiation (Trapp 1938; Evans, Whitmore & Wong 1960).
However, the amount of variation within the forests is likely to be much less than for, say, light characteristics because of air movements; Baynton et al. (1965) found a close correlation between temperatures on two 60 m towers 1100 m apart in level forest in Colombia. The variation is likely to be relatively unimportant in comparing the high forest phase of one forest with that of another.One may expect to be able to gain an indication of conditions in the upper part of the canopy from records taken in a clearing. Geiger (1961) has shown that one may expect from considerations of interception and loss of radiation a parallel between the uppermost part of the forest canopy and the soil or turf of a clearing; both are expected to be hotter by day and cooler by night tha...