2016
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromonospora profundi sp. nov., isolated from deep marine sediment

Abstract: A novel actinobacterial strain, designated DS3010T, was isolated from a Black Sea marine sediment and characterized using a polyphasic approach. The strain was shown to have chemotaxonomic, morphological and phylogenetic properties consistent with classification as representing a member of the genus Micromonospora. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence studies showed that the strain was most closely related to the type strains of Micromonospora saelicesensis (99.5 %), Micromonospora chokoriensis (99.4 %) and Micr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topology clearly showed the close relationship between the two groups as visualized by the branch lengths which were almost inexistent. Group II ( M. noduli ) also showed a close relationship with the type strains of Micromonospora profundi isolated from a deep marine sediment (Veyisoglu et al, 2016 ) and Micromonospora ureilytica isolated from Pisum sativum (Carro et al, 2016 ), also recovered in this group. Reported DDH values between M. saelicesensis and M. ureilytica and M. profundi (Veyisoglu et al, 2016 ) were 28.4 and 56.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The topology clearly showed the close relationship between the two groups as visualized by the branch lengths which were almost inexistent. Group II ( M. noduli ) also showed a close relationship with the type strains of Micromonospora profundi isolated from a deep marine sediment (Veyisoglu et al, 2016 ) and Micromonospora ureilytica isolated from Pisum sativum (Carro et al, 2016 ), also recovered in this group. Reported DDH values between M. saelicesensis and M. ureilytica and M. profundi (Veyisoglu et al, 2016 ) were 28.4 and 56.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Group II ( M. noduli ) also showed a close relationship with the type strains of Micromonospora profundi isolated from a deep marine sediment (Veyisoglu et al, 2016 ) and Micromonospora ureilytica isolated from Pisum sativum (Carro et al, 2016 ), also recovered in this group. Reported DDH values between M. saelicesensis and M. ureilytica and M. profundi (Veyisoglu et al, 2016 ) were 28.4 and 56.9%, respectively. A DDH value of 50.9% was found between M. noduli GUI 43 T and M. ureilytica GUI23 T (Carro et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The family Micromonosporaceae, including the genus Micromonospora, is a widely distributed group from marine environments [3][4][5]. This family was first proposed by Krasil'nikov [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micromonospora is the type genus of the family Micromonosporaceae, which are Gram positive, filamentous, aerobic bacteria which have diverse habitats such as soil, water, marine sediment and mangrove (1)(2)(3) . This family produces many of the well-known antibiotics such as the aminoglycosides gentamicin and amikacin (4) .…”
Section: Genome Annoucmentmentioning
confidence: 99%