1995
DOI: 10.1177/107155769500200411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micronized Estradiol and Progesterone: Effects on Carbohydrate Metabolism in Reproductive-Age Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, premenopausal women taking oral doses of natural progesterone for 11-14 days exhibited no difference in HGP in the basal state or during a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in studies carried out before and after treatment (65). HGP was similarly unaffected in women who took combined oral dosages of natural estradiol and progesterone (65). The route of progesterone administration (subcutaneous vs. oral), the progesterone levels achieved [>15 ng/ ml in the women vs. 95 ng/ml (equivalent to levels in the last trimester of pregnancy) in rats], or the duration of use may explain the differences in the human and rat findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, premenopausal women taking oral doses of natural progesterone for 11-14 days exhibited no difference in HGP in the basal state or during a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in studies carried out before and after treatment (65). HGP was similarly unaffected in women who took combined oral dosages of natural estradiol and progesterone (65). The route of progesterone administration (subcutaneous vs. oral), the progesterone levels achieved [>15 ng/ ml in the women vs. 95 ng/ml (equivalent to levels in the last trimester of pregnancy) in rats], or the duration of use may explain the differences in the human and rat findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…During a low-dose hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (circulating insulin ~2.5 times basal), the residual HGP in the progesterone-treated rats was 2.5 times greater than in the control animals, but in both groups HGP was virtually completely suppressed during high-dose insulin infusion (~20 times basal) (49). In contrast, premenopausal women taking oral doses of natural progesterone for 11-14 days exhibited no difference in HGP in the basal state or during a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in studies carried out before and after treatment (65). HGP was similarly unaffected in women who took combined oral dosages of natural estradiol and progesterone (65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies have shown cycle-dependent differences in plasma insulin responses that were similar in magnitude to our study (38), albeit non-significant. Additionally, another study that attempted to experimentally reproduce luteal phase estradiol and progesterone levels by administration of oral micronized estradiol and progesterone found a similar magnitude increase in plasma insulin response to the hyperglycemic clamp (45). Importantly, we should stress that comparison of post-treatment insulin dynamics data to either baseline follicular or luteal phase measurements separately did not reveal an effect of GnRHa, suggesting that any cycle-dependent differences in insulin secretion would not impact the overall conclusions of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Unfortunately, no study has directly measured the effect of ovarian hormones on glucose-induced glucose disposal. One study that attempted to experimentally reproduce luteal phase estradiol and progesterone levels by administration of oral micronized estradiol and progesterone failed to find an effect of either hormone alone or in combination on glucose disposal measured under euglycemic and hyperinsulinemic conditions (45), suggesting no effect of these hormones on glucose-induced glucose disposal. Thus, reasons to explain differences between the two studies are not readily apparent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%