2014
DOI: 10.1002/em.21914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micronucleus test on Triturus carnifex as a tool for environmental biomonitoring

Abstract: The amphibian micronucleus test has been widely used during the last 30 years to test the genotoxic properties of several chemicals and as a tool for ecogenotoxic monitoring. The vast majority of these studies were performed on peripheral blood of urodelan larvae and anuran tadpoles and to a lesser extent adults were also used. In this study, we developed protocols for measuring micronuclei in adult shed skin cells and larval gill cells of the Italian crested newt (Triturus carnifex). Amphibians were collected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, according to Silva et al (2010), it is due to the fact that the biological responses of ultrasound are not only dependent on frequency, or pulse intensity, but also relate to the duration of the intervention. (11,12) Thus, this same group submitted to 10% pulse regimes, dosages of 0.2 and 0.4 W/cm 2 showed no statistically significant differences between them in any of the three evaluation periods, on the other hand, Oliveira et al (2008) fibroblasts to undergo the action of ultrasonic 0.2 W/cm 2 -10% difference detected at all times (24, 48 and 72 hours). (13) Accordingly, in a similar study, the authors investigate the doses of 0.2 and 0.6 W/cm 2 with pulse 10% and 20% in fibroblast cultures also found a significant increase in cell viability in periods of 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This, according to Silva et al (2010), it is due to the fact that the biological responses of ultrasound are not only dependent on frequency, or pulse intensity, but also relate to the duration of the intervention. (11,12) Thus, this same group submitted to 10% pulse regimes, dosages of 0.2 and 0.4 W/cm 2 showed no statistically significant differences between them in any of the three evaluation periods, on the other hand, Oliveira et al (2008) fibroblasts to undergo the action of ultrasonic 0.2 W/cm 2 -10% difference detected at all times (24, 48 and 72 hours). (13) Accordingly, in a similar study, the authors investigate the doses of 0.2 and 0.6 W/cm 2 with pulse 10% and 20% in fibroblast cultures also found a significant increase in cell viability in periods of 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For instance, the protective barriers of amphibian skin are more complex than those of aquatic organisms (Chuong et al, 2002), because the stratum corneum initially occurs in the epidermis of adult amphibians to form a barrier to protect underlying tissue from infection (Alibardi, 2003). Moreover, amphibians have been widely used to test the toxicity of pesticides (Mouchet et al, 2006) and environmental heavy metals such as cadmium due to their permeable skin that can more easily absorb substances dissolved in water (Udroiu et al, 2015). Furthermore, amphibian skin also participates in assistant respiration, for about 30% oxygen exchange and most of carbon dioxide elimination occurs through the skin (Jorgensen, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%