2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micropapillary adenocarcinoma of lung: Morphological criteria and diagnostic reproducibility among pulmonary pathologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As group A, group C includes TRU‐type LADCs that predominantly affect female nonsmokers. This type has a micropapillary element in lepidic or papillary backgrounds, where proportions of the micropapillary element vary among cases, but generally are not so large (typically 5 to 25%) in surgically removed LADCs 13,14 . LADCs of this group are usually described as “lepidic or papillary‐dominant LADC with micropapillary element” or simply as “lepidic or papillary‐dominant LADC” or “minimally invasive adenocarcinoma” in pathological diagnosis reports, and they comprise 13.8% of surgically removed LADCs (Table 1).…”
Section: A Proposal Of Five Essential Groups For Ladcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As group A, group C includes TRU‐type LADCs that predominantly affect female nonsmokers. This type has a micropapillary element in lepidic or papillary backgrounds, where proportions of the micropapillary element vary among cases, but generally are not so large (typically 5 to 25%) in surgically removed LADCs 13,14 . LADCs of this group are usually described as “lepidic or papillary‐dominant LADC with micropapillary element” or simply as “lepidic or papillary‐dominant LADC” or “minimally invasive adenocarcinoma” in pathological diagnosis reports, and they comprise 13.8% of surgically removed LADCs (Table 1).…”
Section: A Proposal Of Five Essential Groups For Ladcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To form such structures, neoplastic cells are inevitably anchorage independent, detach from basement membranes, can grow, and simultaneously have to retain epithelial polarity and an intercellular adhesion system partially 13,23‐26 . It is essential to question how lepidic (or papillary) elements acquire the micropapillary phenotype in terms of their molecular basis 14,23‐25,27 . p53 mutations can be an important factor to trigger this process, 28‐30 but there also seem to be additional unique events.…”
Section: Tumor Progression In the Nonsmokers’ Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mikropapiler merupakan subtipe yang ukuran selnya kecil dan berbentuk kuboid, pola pertumbuhannya mikropapiler, dan terdapat fibrovascular core meskipun jarang. 27 Hasil penelitian Monroig-Bosque et al 13 menunjukkan bahwa adenokarsinoma mikropapiler juga terdapat sel-sel kolumnar, sarang sel tipis memanjang, retraksi stroma yang luas, pembentukan lumen dengan berkas epitel internal, bentuk epitel seperti signet ring, vakuolisasi intra-sitoplasma, banyak sarang di ruang alveolar yang sama, ruang lakunar back-to-back, anastomosis epitel, pleomorfisme yang ditandai, inti yang berorientasi perifer, dan inti yang menyebar secara acak. 13 Subtipe solid terdiri atas sel tumor dengan bentuk poligonal membentuk lembaran yang tidak dikenali, terdapat musin intrasel dengan minimal lima sel tumor pada lapangan pandang kecil, sitoplasma sel jernih dengan inti yang sangat pleomorfik, dan memiliki prognosis yang buruk.…”
Section: Bahasan Morfologi Kanker Paru Tipe Adenokarsinomaunclassified
“…Thus, while 5 or more clusters of STAS may be relevant in terms of survival, the significance of a few (2-4) clusters of STAS remains uncertain. As for the reproducibility of STAS among pathologists, in the study by Monroig-Bosque and colleagues, the diagnosis of STAS in 30 adenocarcinomas with significant micropapillary pattern varied from 34.1% to 52.8% (mean 43.4%) among 15 pulmonary pathologists (25). Further large-scale studies are warranted to elucidate and improve the reproducibility of the STAS diagnosis by pathologists.…”
Section: Editorial Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%