2015
DOI: 10.2144/000114245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micropatterning Strategies to Engineer Controlled Cell and Tissue Architecture in Vitro

Abstract: Micropatterning strategies, which enable control over cell and tissue architecture in vitro, have emerged as powerful platforms for modelling tissue microenvironments at different scales and complexities. Here, we provide an overview of popular micropatterning techniques, along with detailed descriptions, to guide new users through the decision making process of which micropatterning procedure to use, and how to best obtain desired tissue patterns. Example techniques and the types of biological observations th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this investigation is to elucidate the general biophysical mechanisms underlying contact guidance of individual cells. Various in-vitro chemical micropatterning approaches have been developed to study cellular contact guidance, as model systems to simplify the highly complex in vivo environments [19,20]. We followed such an approach and seeded a low density of myofibroblasts (specifically, Human Vena Saphena Cells; see Methods) on effectively rigid substrates microprinted with fibronectin stripes of widths , ranging from greater than 1.5 mm (resembling a homogeneous 2D substrate) to 50 μm; see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this investigation is to elucidate the general biophysical mechanisms underlying contact guidance of individual cells. Various in-vitro chemical micropatterning approaches have been developed to study cellular contact guidance, as model systems to simplify the highly complex in vivo environments [19,20]. We followed such an approach and seeded a low density of myofibroblasts (specifically, Human Vena Saphena Cells; see Methods) on effectively rigid substrates microprinted with fibronectin stripes of widths , ranging from greater than 1.5 mm (resembling a homogeneous 2D substrate) to 50 μm; see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by creating a nonadhesive area via a physical barrier (using stamps, as seen in (21)) or a chemical barrier (e.g., bovine serum albumin (BSA) (20)). The first population of cells will adhere to the area surrounding the barrier; once the barrier is removed (either by physical removal or by coating the nonadhesive area with an adhesive matrix factor (20)), the second cell population binds in the remaining space (22). This method has the advantage of allowing cells to interact via both secreted factors and cellcell interactions, but is laborious, requiring additional steps and specialized equipment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, grinding offers a smaller potential feature size, due to it not being limited by resolution, or spot size as the case with photolithography [16] and laser processing [10], respectively. It is also a relatively simpler manufacturing process, not requiring a clean room as is the case with lithography [6]. Little research has been done on grinding micro-patterned surfaces for cell control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%