“…The radar microphysical retrieval techniques in ice are still in the process of evaluation and refinement using in situ microphysical airborne and surface observations. However, we believe that Equations 5-10 used in this study is a good first attempt because they produce results consistent with occasional in situ measurements in the proximity of the polarimetric radars (e.g., Murphy et al, 2020;Nguyen et al, 2019;Ryzhkov et al, 1998) and which are in a ballpark of the majority of airborne probes' measurements of IWC, D m , and N t reported in the literature (e.g., Finlon et al, 2019;Heymsfield et al, 2013Heymsfield et al, , 2015Heymsfield et al, , 2017Huang et al, 2021;Leroy et al, 2017;McFarquhar et al, 2007;Stechman et al, 2020). As mentioned before, our retrieved D m is the ratio of the fourth and third moments of the size distribution of equivolume diameters which is different from D mm or median volume (D mv ) size commonly estimated from in situ airborne microphysical probes which measure a maximal particle dimension.…”