2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep14947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: the first reported values of particles in surface and sub-surface samples

Abstract: Plastic, as a form of marine litter, is found in varying quantities and sizes around the globe from surface waters to deep-sea sediments. Identifying patterns of microplastic distribution will benefit an understanding of the scale of their potential effect on the environment and organisms. As sea ice extent is reducing in the Arctic, heightened shipping and fishing activity may increase marine pollution in the area. Microplastics may enter the region following ocean transport and local input, although baseline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
364
2
16

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 907 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
26
364
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…This will take time, and meanwhile monitoring should already be going on and preferably also the targets and threshold values set. Manta trawl has been one of the first devices used for assessing microlitter in the water column/sea surface (Eriksen et al, 2013, 2014, Lusher et al, 2015. In spite of its wide and successful use, manta may also be criticised, because of the likely inaccuracy when converting the amount of collected litter particles into concentrations per water volume, or because of the actual size fraction that manta is able to collect, which is restricted to N333 μm.…”
Section: Manta Vs Pump -Comparison Of Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This will take time, and meanwhile monitoring should already be going on and preferably also the targets and threshold values set. Manta trawl has been one of the first devices used for assessing microlitter in the water column/sea surface (Eriksen et al, 2013, 2014, Lusher et al, 2015. In spite of its wide and successful use, manta may also be criticised, because of the likely inaccuracy when converting the amount of collected litter particles into concentrations per water volume, or because of the actual size fraction that manta is able to collect, which is restricted to N333 μm.…”
Section: Manta Vs Pump -Comparison Of Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Besides the potential effect of ingestion, plastic particles can act as vectors for organic pollutants [9] or function as floaters for (invasive) rafting species [10]. The occurrence and distribution of plastic debris in the marine environment has been studied even in the most remote areas, such as the arctic [11] and the ocean floor [12]. However, even though rivers are recognized as a major source of marine litter [13][14][15], the occurrence of plastic debris in freshwater systems just started to receive attention [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also the most suitable option, while the manta net is surely out of the wake zone. In some surveys manta net was fixed from the stern of the vessel 17,18 , but in that case you have to be sure that the net is out of the wake zone. The distance, on which the trawl is set for sampling, should be determined individually, since the zone of turbulences caused by the vessel varies from the size of the vessel and from the speed of the boat 19,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%