2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastics in fillets of Mediterranean seafood. A risk assessment study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For chemical contaminants, inter-tissue extrapolation has been well-studied for some organisms and compounds, and concentrations in one tissue can be related to other tissues through conversion factors (Ackerman et al, 2016), but no such studies have been undertaken to date for MP. An important finding is that several field reports on non-Arctic fish specimen have shown MP occurrence outside the gut contents, in other fish tissues (Ferrante et al, 2022;Makhdoumi et al, 2022;Selvam et al, 2021; illustrated in Figure 2). This has not been investigated in Arctic fish yet.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations For Microplastic Monitori...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For chemical contaminants, inter-tissue extrapolation has been well-studied for some organisms and compounds, and concentrations in one tissue can be related to other tissues through conversion factors (Ackerman et al, 2016), but no such studies have been undertaken to date for MP. An important finding is that several field reports on non-Arctic fish specimen have shown MP occurrence outside the gut contents, in other fish tissues (Ferrante et al, 2022;Makhdoumi et al, 2022;Selvam et al, 2021; illustrated in Figure 2). This has not been investigated in Arctic fish yet.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations For Microplastic Monitori...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The plastic degradation, due to thermo-oxidative degradation processes and/or mechanical fragmentation and/or biodegradation, produces smaller particles classified according to the size as: nanoplastics ≤0.1 µm (NPs), 0.1 µm < microplastics <5 mm (MPs), 0.5< mesoplastics <5 cm, 5< macroplastics <50 cm, and megaplastics >50 cm [7,8]. Moreover, MPs has been categorized as: primary (particles resulting from the commodity production such as exfoliating, toothpastes or cosmetics, and personal hygiene products) and secondary (particles resulting from the degradation of products such as packaging or clothing) [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPs and NPs size seems to favor their penetration into animal and vegetal tissues and cells besides accumulation in organs [11][12][13], causing alterations in physiological process [3]. Some studies highlighted the capable of MPs and NPs to cause toxicity, chronic inflammation and increase risk of neoplasm [7,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the main drawback of other techniques, such as the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis (FTIR), requiring comparative screening of reference spectra to identify the chemical nature of the sample. This limitation does not apply to SEM/EDX, which is also a faster technique with the potential to analyse many samples in a relatively short time 33 , 35 – 37 . Conversely, procedures of FTIR spectroscopy are longer, leading to analysis of just a sub-sample of the total extracted microplastics 31 , 38 , 39 , with a consequent decrease of accuracy (e.g., due to wrong identifications and/or underestimation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%