2005
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.40.3.740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micropropagation of Two Selected Male Kiwifruit and Analysis of Genetic Variation with AFLP Markers

Abstract: A simple and reliable protocol for micropropagation during 12 subcultures of two field growth male plants of kiwifruit [Actinidia deliciosa (A.Chev.) Liang and Ferguson] is described. The best results of shoot multiplication and elongation were obtained in Cheng's K(h) medium in the presence of 0.5 μm NAA, 22 μm BA and 1.4 μm GA3 for `Tomuri' explants, and of 0.1 μm NAA, 4.4 μ Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6), taking into account that the initial genetic variability was narrow since a single plant of each genotype was used. This genetic variation was higher than that reported by Palombi and Damiano (2002) using micropropagated kiwifruit plants, or than that observed by our own group in micropropagated plants of the same genotypes used in the present study (Prado et al 2005). This may reflect the higher genetic variation expected when indirect organogenesis is achieved (Bouman and De Klerk 1997;Yamagishi et al 1996) perhaps due to a higher rate of cell proliferation, implying more cell divisions, as well as longer culture periods.…”
Section: Somaclonal Variation Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…6), taking into account that the initial genetic variability was narrow since a single plant of each genotype was used. This genetic variation was higher than that reported by Palombi and Damiano (2002) using micropropagated kiwifruit plants, or than that observed by our own group in micropropagated plants of the same genotypes used in the present study (Prado et al 2005). This may reflect the higher genetic variation expected when indirect organogenesis is achieved (Bouman and De Klerk 1997;Yamagishi et al 1996) perhaps due to a higher rate of cell proliferation, implying more cell divisions, as well as longer culture periods.…”
Section: Somaclonal Variation Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The AFLP technique has been widely used to identify cultivars and germplasms in many fruit crops such as apple (Kenis and Keulemans, 2005), citrus (Pang et al, 2007), and kiwifruit (Prado et al, 2005). AFLP markers have some advantages over other molecular markers such as a high level of polymorphism, high reproducibility, a wide distribution of markers in the genome, and a lack of prerequisite sequences (Mueller and Wolfenbarger, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show that P. maculatum is prone to variability caused by conditions of in vitro cultivation, even if the callus stage is omitted. Somaclonal variants were already reported in shoot cultures of different species [ 49 , 50 , 51 ]. This lack of genetic stability can be recognized as disadvantageous for conservation purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%