2019
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11121891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroRNA-9-5p-CDX2 Axis: A Useful Prognostic Biomarker for Patients with Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: A lack of caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) protein expression has been proposed as a prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the relationship between CDX2 levels and the survival of patients with stage II/III CRC along with the relationship between microRNAs (miRs) and CDX2 expression are unclear. Tissue samples were collected from patients with stage II/III CRC surgically treated at Kyoto University Hospital. CDX2 expression was semi-quantitatively evaluated by immunohisto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be why the incidence reported in early-stage CRC is so low and difficult to assess. Regardless, our findings are in line with those of other publications [ 50 , 68 , 84 ]. As mentioned, the prognostic value of CDX2 is most often described in poorly differentiated tumors, but it is not so clear for well-differentiated or stage II and III tumors [ 68 , 85 , 86 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This may be why the incidence reported in early-stage CRC is so low and difficult to assess. Regardless, our findings are in line with those of other publications [ 50 , 68 , 84 ]. As mentioned, the prognostic value of CDX2 is most often described in poorly differentiated tumors, but it is not so clear for well-differentiated or stage II and III tumors [ 68 , 85 , 86 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…It was reported that CDX2 loss does not confer a worse prognosis when considering MMR-deficient cases [ 46 ], although it predicted poor clinical outcome in stage II CRC cases with MSS phenotype [ 45 ]. According to previous studies that included stage II and stage III CRC cases [ 18 , 24 , 41 , 42 , 47 ], but contrarily to others [ 16 , 45 , 48 , 49 ], we did not find prognostic nor predictive value for CDX2 expression in stage II CRC. Yet, this could be, at least in part, due to the size of our series with consequent low number of tumors with loss of CDX2 expression, low number of recurrence events as well as low number of patients treated with chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…No studies showing differential expression of miR-9-5p between peritumoral and tumoral tissues are reported. However, miR-9-5p has been indicated a prognostic biomarker in CRC [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%